Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: zencat
You still don't seem to get it so let me spell it out very specifically. You directly implied that Ted claimed that drug users are; 1)loosers 2)talentless and/or 3)socialists.

One more time…your quote; "Just saying, drug use doesn't automatically make one a talentless loser or socialist.

I took issue with your statement as follows:
1) drug users are/become loosers – Ted did say that, I agree with it, and there is enormous support for that position.
2)drug users are/become tallentless - that is not true and Ted didn’t say that – you did.
3)drug users are/become socialists - that is not true and Ted didn’t say that – you did.

I agree that Ted called drug users loosers. He is right in that regard. You do not need to post for a fourth time that the article is about drug users being loosers; virtually everyone got that point the first time they read it.

You cannot support your assertion that Ted claimed drug users are talentless and/or socialist.

Perhaps the proper topic of discussion should be that drug use causes delusions of persecution and/or paranoia, errors in logical thinking and gaps in reading comprehension.

178 posted on 07/31/2007 5:08:48 AM PDT by 70times7 (Sense... some don't make any, some don't have any - or so the former would appear to the latter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies ]


To: 70times7

The word is “LOSER”. ;-)

Although, it could be “looser”, being that they also tend to be sex-obsessed.


179 posted on 07/31/2007 5:50:55 AM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson