...unless local Rat officials were to allow such access.
Oh, this won’t get any MSM coverage...they’re fixated on who fired who at the Justice Department, and everyone knows that the Democrats benefit from voter fraud, so this wil never see the light of day.
This is so lame! A bunch of idiot Democrats can’t figure out a butterfly ballot in 2000 so we spend seven years on voting machines that they can’t figure out how to use.
This is a continuation of Bowen’s little anti-Diebold snit. Any form of voting can be modified if one has unlimited access to the ballots. Think ‘erasers’, and ‘hand punches’. The security for any voting system is in the context in which it’s used, not in the hardware itself.
Here in Oklahoma we use a very simple method of voting. Ballots are printed on paper about 11 x 17. Each candidate or referendum is written in simple text and next to the name or question is a arrow with a gap in the line. Each voter is issued a special pen and simply connects the line for the candidate he or she is voting for. The ballots are then placed in a machine where they are both kept and safeguarded as well as counted. The count is kept electronically and the paper ballots are secured to verify and questions or irregularities. Its simple, cheap and easily understood.
Then if we catch anyone voting illegally we take them out and hang ‘em!
And if not, so what? There's many a one from a Republican precinct at the bottom of San Francisco Bay!
nobody has election machines under armed guard in 2007 for 2008.
If anything the hacking could already be done.
Ping.