Skip to comments.
No More Judges for Bush, Says Schumer
NewsMax ^
| July 27 '07
Posted on 07/29/2007 10:40:34 AM PDT by infocats
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-27 last
To: Ronaldus Magnus Reagan
That’s okay...let ginzberg or stevens retire....I like 5 to 3 conservative decisions....let Bush not send another one before he leaves office. They’ll be screaming for Bush to nominate some one just for “balance” but he can just hold back and let the 5 rule over the other 3. Even with 4/4 split decisions concerning the conservative rulings of lower courts; those rulings will be left standing.
So go ahead Shumy, cut off your nose to spite your face!
To: LdSentinal
Methinks John Paul Stevens or Ruth Bader Ginsberg are on the verge of retiring.Neither will retire without a Democrat in the White House to replace them...
the infowarrior
To: John Semmens
The new conservative bloc is undermining the authority of the judiciary. Breyer complained. If this trend is allowed to continue unchecked, the Courts ability to rule this country will be seriously compromised. We can only hope that the Democratically controlled Senate will prevent any of Bushs further nominees from being approved. That's the most stunning comment I've read in a long time.
To: John Semmens
Supreme Court Justice Stephen G. Breyer, spoke with Specter earlier this month, telling him that the court term that ended in June was notable for rulings that reversed some long-standing decisions. The new conservative bloc is undermining the authority of the judiciary. Breyer complained. If this trend is allowed to continue unchecked, the Courts ability to rule this country will be seriously compromised. We can only hope that the Democratically controlled Senate will prevent any of Bushs further nominees from being approved.I do not believe Mr. Justice Breyer said any such thing.
24
posted on
07/30/2007 7:01:10 AM PDT
by
Jim Noble
(Trails of troubles, roads of battle, paths of victory we shall walk.)
To: infocats
Schumer...crawl back under that rock and do us all a favor.
25
posted on
07/30/2007 7:02:11 AM PDT
by
NordP
(HUNTER: "The real question for Mexico--Why are your people crossing burning deserts to get away?")
To: infocats
This is what the 08 White House contest is ALL about. Not the W.O.T., Not the Economy, Not for ANYTHING else other than “Control Over” Supreme Court PERIOD. This was the route the Liberal’s have taken since 1947 Everson vs Board of Education, and the Legislation Passed through the Courts since then. We are truly on the razors edge. Fun Huh......:)
26
posted on
07/30/2007 10:40:13 AM PDT
by
PEACE ENFORCER
(The U.S. Constitution has been Reduced to a Meaningless Document.)
To: John Semmens
“the Courts ability to rule this country”
We need a simple test of the knowledge of the Constitution to be filed with the campaign papers, made public.
This is shockingly ignorant for a senator.
27
posted on
07/30/2007 7:02:13 PM PDT
by
DBrow
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-27 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson