So what. At least it'll be safe for the women, there wouldn't be any of this street-walking or sex in public places. They wouldn't have to give their cut to pimps.
How is prostitution any different from picking up a chick at a bar and taking her home?
01-03-05
telegraph.co.uk
‘If you don’t take a job as a prostitute, we can stop your benefits’
A 25-year-old waitress who turned down a job providing “sexual services’’ at a brothel in Berlin faces possible cuts to her unemployment benefit under laws introduced this year.
Prostitution was legalised in Germany just over two years ago and brothel owners – who must pay tax and employee health insurance – were granted access to official databases of jobseekers. (snip)
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2005/01/30/wgerm30.xml
I cannot contemplate an exchange of cash for the physical and emotional impact of sexual intercourse.
Prostitution is no different from paying someone to service you as a slave, if only temporarily.
Because the act of sex affects the brain chemistry of the participants, and specifically denies the emotional and physical consequences it should be treated as any drug problem.
A free people can only retain their freedom if they are also moral. Freedom cannot survive a generally immoral population.
“How is prostitution any different from picking up a chick at a bar and taking her home?”
You need someone to actually explain that to you?