Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The real life Doctor Who who believes he can build a time machine
The Daily Mail ^ | 27th July 2007 | MICHAEL HANLON

Posted on 07/27/2007 5:08:29 PM PDT by fanfan

Suppose it were possible to go back in time and meet the dead. To say all the things you never got a chance to tell a loved one who died before there was a chance to make your peace.

Just think if you could go back and warn someone that their lifestyle, their smoking or heavy drinking was driving them into an early grave.

You would not only be able to meet the dead - but to save them as well.

A new book tells the story of an extraordinary man whose life work is inspired by a longing to do just that.

It was the devastating sudden death of Ronald Mallett's beloved father which sparked his obsession with time-travel.

In pursuit of his seemingly impossible goal, he has overcome poverty and prejudice to become one of only a handful of top-flight black physicists in the United States.

He has enjoyed a glittering career as a professor at one of the country's leading universities - an achievement in itself.

But there has been only one motivation: to build a time machine. And, after years of painstaking research, Mallett is sure he's cracked it.

His journey began in the early 1950s, when this intelligent and inquisitive boy was ten years old.

He lived with his parents Boyd and Dorothy in a working-class Jewish area of the Bronx, in New York city. The Malletts were happy there, having escaped the terrible racism of the Deep South.

Boyd Mallett was a gadget freak, and a talented, respected electronic technician - one of his jobs was to wire up the new United Nations building being constructed in Manhattan.

His son worshipped him, and the pair would spend many hours in the evenings experimenting with capacitors and circuits, building crystal radios and other gadgets.

Then, the night after his parents' 11th wedding anniversary, Boyd died suddenly of a heart attack.

"For me, the sun rose and set on him," Ron Mallett said later. "It completely devastated me."

Boyd Mallett's death was probably preventable. He had always been a heavy smoker and workaholic and had started drinking too much.

His son sank into a despair that would not lift; indeed, he became severely depressed. Ronald simply could not accept that he would never see his father again. And he began to wonder if there was a way they could be reunited.

Mallett devoured the pulp sci-fi comics of the time, and began to realise that time travel was, at least in fiction, a possibility. Then he read what is one of the finest science-fiction stories ever written, HG Wells's The Time Machine.

In the novel, the time-travelling hero explains: "Scientific people know very well that time is only a kind of space. We can move forward and backward in time, just as we can move forward and backward in space."

Mallett was dumbfounded. If he could build a time machine, he could go back and change history and prevent his father's death.

From that day, Mallet became obsessed with time travel, despite having no clear idea of how it could be accomplished.

Wells's book was, of course, entirely fictional, and yet, just a few years after it was written, a German-Jewish physicist called Albert Einstein blew the science community apart. Einstein showed that time and space were indeed different aspects of the same thing - a concept called spacetime - which is at the heart of how physicists understand the way the universe is.

Mallett became obsessed with the German scientist - who had died in 1955, the same year as his father. Most importantly, Mallett realised - as Einstein had himself - that the new way of thinking about gravity, space and time contained in the physicist's Special and General theories of relativity meant that a time machine was at least possible in theory.

Einstein's equations showed that by twisting spacetime around, it is possible in theory to make a connection from future to past. Step into this timeloop, and you could emerge years later or earlier.

This idea would form the basis of Mallett's putative time machine. But, back in 1950s New York, he was a long way from his goal. Growing up poor and black, one of four children raised by a widowed mother who made ends meet by window-cleaning, is not an ideal recipe for academic success.

Undaunted, he studied hard at school and achieved good grades, particularly in the sciences. However, a university education was out of the question - there was simply no way his family could afford to pay for it.

So Ron Mallett joined the U.S. Air Force, in the hope of being granted a military scholarship so that he could later study physics. His test grades were so good that he was fast-tracked into the USAF's electronics school.

Despite his success, the past still intruded in the most horrible ways. Mallett's first tour of duty was in Biloxi, in the Deep South. There, for the first time in his life, he encountered the soul-destroying racism that had driven his grandparents north 40 years before.

"The first thing I noticed," he writes, "were the signs, the likes of which I had never seen before. 'Whites only'. 'No Colored'."

There was talk of beatings and worse for black servicemen who strayed off base. Mallett made a vow to remain on base for the entire duration of his training, which included courses in electronics and computing. He also spent hours in the well-equipped library, devouring everything he could both by and about Einstein.

His studies paid off. After he was discharged, he won a place at Pennsylvania State University, and began a degree in physics.

Eventually, in 1973, he won his doctorate, only the 79th black American ever to do so in this subject. Part of his thesis was an investigation into the theoretical possibility of using gravity to reverse the passage of time. In 1975, he was awarded a job as a professor of physics at Connecticut University - where he has worked ever since.

He remains the only black physics professor in America.

Despite the respectability of his CV, he still felt he couldn't discuss his ideas openly. "I feared professional suicide," he says now.

But, as his work continued, the story got out. Mallett's time machine went public in 2001, when New Scientist magazine ran an article about his design, and TV appearances followed.

"Mallett isn't mad," the New Scientist article said. "None of the known laws of physics forbids time-travel.

"In theory, shunting matter back and forth through time shouldn't be that difficult."

So, how do you build a machine which will take you back into the past - or forward to the future?

In fact, there have been several plans for a time machine devised by physicists since Einstein's mind-blowing discovery that reverse timetravel should be possible.

In 1974, Frank Tipler, a physicist at Tulane University in New Orleans, calculated that by constructing a huge cylinder in space and setting it spinning, it would be possible to drag spacetime into loops, creating lots of backwards time portals into which you could leap and then emerge in the past.

But he calculated that the cylinder would have to weigh about as much as the sun, and be compressed into a tube 60 miles long and 40 miles across.

Alternatively, as physicist Kip Thorn proposed in the 1980s, you simply need to create a 'wormhole' - a tear in the fabric of spacetime, using perhaps a tame black hole or dozens of nuclear bombs.

These ideas, while scientifically correct, were hardly practical. Squashing the sun into something the size of Dorset is likely to be beyond our ken for some time, and harnessing the power of a black hole sounds even harder.

Mallett's solution is much simpler. He thinks he can reverse time by using just a circulating beam of light. Light is energy, and energy can cause spacetime to warp and bend, just like gigantic spinning cylinders, he explains.

In 2000, he published a paper showing how a circulating beam of laser light could create a vortex in spacetime. It was, he says, his eureka moment.

The details are complex, to say the least. But, in essence, Mallett believes it is possible to use a series of four circulating laser light beams swirling spacetime around like "a spoon stirring milk into coffee".

If you were to walk into this 'timetunnel' - which would resemble a large vortex of light a few feet across - you could emerge at some point in the past. He thinks he can build a prototype machine in the lab, using today's technology, with funds of just $250,000 (£120,000).

However, Prof Mallett is fussy about who gives him the money. "We want non-military sources. I don't want to get to a certain point and get 'top secret' slapped over the project and have it taken away from us."

There are several important things to realise about Mallett's time machine. For a start, it would only be possible to travel back in time to a point after the machine was first switched on.

If you turned on the machine, on January 1 say, and left it running for three months, you could enter the machine in March and only travel back as far as January 1.

So no trips back to the Middle Ages or to Ancient Rome.

This would be staggering enough. Just think: a time-traveller could go back and meet himself. Or he could send back information into the past - including the results of horse races, stock market movements.

But consider, too, all the weird paradoxes that the time machine would create. You could come face-to-face with your past self, causing untold confusion. What, for example, would happen if you killed your past self? Would both versions of 'you' die at the same time?

Mallet believes these paradoxes would not in themselves prevent the construction of such a machine. But there are plenty of sceptics.

Some physicists think that the laser upon which his machine depends would need to be impossibly large or powerful. Others point to Stephen Hawking's 'chronology protection conjecture', which says that quantum effects may conspire to prevent the possibility of a time machine.

But, while some physicists have questioned Mallett's approach, no one has yet proved with absolute certainty that the machine would not work.

Mallett is now 62 years old. He still believes he will live to see the creation of the first time machine.

Sadly, the way it works means that he will never be able to fulfil his original wish - to warn his father about his deteriorating health. "My solace is that if this works, future generations will be able to use this technology to prevent the tragedy that I went through," he says.

If he is right, the little boy from the Bronx who lost his beloved father all those years ago will end up being the most famous inventor in history.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; US: New York
KEYWORDS: stringtheory; timetravel
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-240 last
To: NicknamedBob
It's going to be an uphill battle for you to truly understand Quantum Mechanics. Einstein, and Galileo long before, made a clear distinction between LOCAL and GLOBAL. Locally the earth is flat and unmoving, globally it is round, spinning and orbiting the sun. We have a saying in physics : when all else fails, go back to Newton. Newton's First law : an object(collection of fermions) will remain at rest, or move in a straight line(momentum) at a constant velocity(ignoring curvilinear gravity effects)until an external force(mass-time)is impressed upon it. Momentum is mv, mass is mv^2/2, an intergral/derivative relationship. Locally the collection of fermions feels NOTHING in Momentum, it's in a balanced Wave=Particle state. Globally, you as an external observer with your stop watch, are in an unbalanced W not=to P or mass-time state(ie, using Kinetic Energy at some delta rate). The formulas are : t=dKE=m=(W not=to P) and not-t=PE=M=(W=P). W here means Matter Waves, the other, hidden, invisible half of your existence. Just as light(the EM spectrum) is WAVES as well as PARTICLES, so is matter(ie, fermions, ie, electrons, protons, neutrons, quarks)also WAVES as well as particles. You don't SEE them, you feel them as decelerations/weight(W>P)in your "time-eye" body, as the "observer". Physicists use the term : "collapse of the wavefunction" but I prefer "over running matter wave energy in newtons of wave FORCE". Think of a surf wave slamming into a cliff/seawall, that's how "time" works, with your clock, with your haptics/neural network, stopping at your brain. Try this simple CM experiment : throw a baseball back and forth between your hands. When you accelerate it(coulomb repulsion of electron clouds actually)you have increased the Particle velocity(Pv)but not the complementary matter Wavelength(Ws for Wave shape or spectrum, or lambda), it ALSO has to be increased to match that higher Pv, and thus reach a higher momentum level(W=P). Now, you NEVER feel that local, internal increase in Ws anymore than you do in freefall. What YOU feel is a resistance due to your throwing hand being DEcelerated. Newton's Third : For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction(that's how rockets work). Thus the hidden matter wave energy you are investing in the accelerated baseball is INVISIBLE, GONE into the "bank". Einstein put it as either keeping your money in your pocket or putting it in the bank(w/o deposit slips), but you can't have it both ways! That would violate the First Law of Thermodynamics : Energy is never created or destroyed, only transferred. Thus, LOCALLY the increased +dWs of acceleration is NEVER felt, sensed, detected; even if it's your own body. Thus you don't feel acceleration energy going INTO your body(WP). Thus the impact energy of catching the baseball is that earlier acceleration coming back out(withdrawal slip not included)as deceleration. So try it with any small, dense object : you're throwing matter wave energy back and forth. Real simple if you understand QUANTUM MECHANICS....
221 posted on 08/07/2007 9:25:18 AM PDT by timer (n/0=n=nx0)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: timer
"It's going to be an uphill battle for you to truly understand Quantum Mechanics."

I suppose you think this is the equivalent of getting my attention with a two-by-four.

Why do you think I need a primer on Quantum Mechanics? Because I dispute your contention that time is an illusion?

I have a complete comprehension of all the points you were trying to establish. I understand about the different world-view that an understanding of QM offers.

Try this on for size:

You have a space ship of advanced design. It's reactionless drive depends on high-speed plasma physics. Here's how it works:

You have two very large superconducting rings, with a large mass of plasma circling in each at near-relativistic speeds. They move in opposite directions so that gyroscopic precession effects can be used to shift the orientation of the ship in various directions.

When you are ready to go "thataway", you accelerate the plasma through electrical and magnetic effects, adding mass to the plasma in the process. As they circle the run, and enter an orientation where slowing of the plasma particles can be performed without affecting the course of the ship, mass is removed from the plasma in the form of magnetohydrodynamic energy capture.

In this process, the deceleration forces are trying to disassemble the ship, but it is a sturdy ship. It holds together.

When the plasma is again in a position to be accelerated, it is, as Maxwell's Demon, and all his assorted henchdemons, start rowing as fast as they can.

In a sense, this is a relativistic equivalent of the Dean Drive, and I hope I do not curse it with that appellation. It seems intuitively practical to use the relativistic mass enhancement as a means of producing a reactionless thrust. The rest of the technicalities are left as an exercise for the student.


222 posted on 08/07/2007 3:13:57 PM PDT by NicknamedBob (Thanks to the royalties from my book sales, I now have wealth beyond my dreams of licorice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: fanfan

Great Scott!!


223 posted on 08/07/2007 3:18:21 PM PDT by Equality 7-2521 ("Ron Paul, the only rational Republican" --BadEye)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fanfan
If you were to walk into this 'timetunnel' - which would resemble a large vortex of light a few feet across - you could emerge at some point in the past.

Already been done(in 1966).


224 posted on 08/07/2007 3:22:03 PM PDT by P8riot (I carry a gun because I can't carry a cop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlj18

Tesla was the most exploited too.

People still think Marconi invented radio, for example.


225 posted on 08/07/2007 3:26:10 PM PDT by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: P8riot
P8riot (I carry a gun because I can't carry a cop.)

Just as well. You wouldn't want any cops on your back.

226 posted on 08/07/2007 3:34:00 PM PDT by NicknamedBob (Thanks to the royalties from my book sales, I now have wealth beyond my dreams of licorice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: NicknamedBob
Just as well. You wouldn't want any cops on your back.

The voice of experience?

227 posted on 08/07/2007 3:36:49 PM PDT by P8riot (I carry a gun because I can't carry a cop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: P8riot

Two kids from your state got arrested here for asking directions.

That’ll learn ‘em.


228 posted on 08/07/2007 3:52:31 PM PDT by NicknamedBob (Thanks to the royalties from my book sales, I now have wealth beyond my dreams of licorice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: fanfan
He remains the only black physics professor in America.

Huh? Who makes this stuff up?

229 posted on 08/07/2007 3:56:04 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NicknamedBob
Two kids from your state got arrested here for asking directions.

That’ll learn ‘em.

Only in the PRM would that be an offense. I try to steer clear of any state that doesn't respect my right to defend myself.

230 posted on 08/07/2007 4:14:25 PM PDT by P8riot (I carry a gun because I can't carry a cop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: RinaseaofDs
Tesla was the most exploited too.

People still think Marconi invented radio, for example.

Absolutely. I read what is considered to be the best biography on Tesla a few months ago (written in 1982, by Margaret Cheney (no relation as far as I know). I already knew more about Tesla than 95% of Americans. It was both a great and depressing book. In fact, many of Tesla's attributes I can see within myself. Tesla liked money, but wasn't obsessed with it. It wasn't his driving force every day. I am the same way. It's one of the reasons why I joined the military.

I only know of one soldier who knows who Tesla is, and it's only through a movie. Personally, I think that's sad. First of all, Tesla was arguably the greatest inventor in modern times. But more than that, not many people like to read anymore. I'm playfully ridiculed occasionally because I love to do research (on basically anything and everything).

231 posted on 08/08/2007 6:26:53 AM PDT by tlj18 (Keep your eye on China....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: Williams

“Despite his success, the past still intruded in the most horrible ways. Mallett’s first tour of duty was in Biloxi, in the Deep South. There, for the first time in his life, he encountered the soul-destroying racism that had driven his grandparents north 40 years before. “

This part of article makes me sick. I didn’t know Southerners had the ability to destroy someone’s soul.


232 posted on 08/08/2007 6:36:26 AM PDT by ohioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: tlj18

I read, voraciously, the same biography. Cheney is an amazing biographer. The level of research she did for that book is astounding.

The afterward of that book was interesting too, admissions from the Feds that there were concentric levels of security around Tesla’s work.

I’m an electrical engineer. It’s astounding what is NOT being done in the area of high frequency power, given the eye-witnessed evidence of what Tesla was able to do with it.

It’s 2007, and it was only a week ago that somebody finally announced a method for transmitting power wirelessly, something Tesla was doing in 1918 in Denver. There’s a scene from The Prestige that alludes to it - where Tesla and the magician are standing in a field of light bulbs, and the field lights up. Tesla walks over to a bulb, picks it out of the ground like a carrot, and it goes out. Minute he grips the base of the bulb, the bulb lights up again.

As you know, what the Feds didn’t confiscate got burned up in the lab fire he had around 1904 or thereabouts. Had Tesla been as assiduous about filing patents as Edison was, the world would be a far different place.


233 posted on 08/08/2007 9:12:51 AM PDT by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: RinaseaofDs

Yes, that was one incredible book. I wonder, though, had Tesla not allowed his invention of AC power to be stolen, what else might he have invented? As I remember, starting in the mid-1890’s, he started to have major money problems that only continuously worsened until about 1920 when his physical research was pretty much over. It is no exaggeration to say that Tesla basically invented the 20th century.


234 posted on 08/09/2007 3:42:39 AM PDT by tlj18 (Keep your eye on China....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: Lijahsbubbe
It would seem that one would have to reverse, or increase the expansion of the entire universe since, classically at least, that's what it seems time is based on. Thus it would seem a global rather than a local problem.

Kip Thorne's idea of utilizing a wormhole to such ends might seem interesting, but who wants to go first? And, once in, if you weren't crushed, would general relativity hold up? Could you start and stop where you wanted?

Big...BIG problems....

235 posted on 08/11/2007 12:37:21 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: fanfan
If you turned on the machine, on January 1 say, and left it running for three months, you could enter the machine in March and only travel back as far as January 1.

If it was going to work at all, you would start to see people from the future walking out of the vortex almost as soon as you started it up.

236 posted on 08/11/2007 12:41:01 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RinaseaofDs

The problem, of course, with trying to send substantial amounts of radio energy through the air is that it can and will all too easily be intercepted and dissipated by things that we don’t want to intercept and dissipate it. Tesla could put on a grand show but he could not make wiring obsolete.


237 posted on 08/11/2007 12:45:41 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: null and void

ping


238 posted on 08/11/2007 12:52:26 AM PDT by Exton1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: null and void
"Nothing overt or violent (except maybe for fun...) Just an “ill timed” knock on the door, or some other mood killer... " ================================

Reminds me of the time way back when we broke a stink bomb under my roommates door right when he and his girlfriend were right in the middle of a certain activity.

We could almost literally hear a slide whistle sound effect.

Little did I know I was changing history.

239 posted on 08/11/2007 1:07:26 AM PDT by Manic_Episode (Some mornings, it's just not worth chewing through the leather straps...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Manic_Episode
Little did I know I was changing history.

One is always changing history, to a greater or lesser degree...

240 posted on 08/11/2007 10:05:52 AM PDT by null and void (When they say It’s for the children, never forget that the moonbats consider YOU a child ~Philistone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-240 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson