Skip to comments.
CA: Most day laborers are illegal immigrants with little formal education, report says
North County Times ^
| 7/26/07
| Edward Sifuentes
Posted on 07/26/2007 7:02:13 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
NORTH COUNTY -- A new study shows that day laborers on street corners and in hiring halls make up less than 1 percent of the work force, and that most are in the country illegally.
As local anti-illegal immigration activists intensify their protests over day labor sites, a new statewide study suggests that public attention on this matter is out of proportion to the number of day laborers in California.
The number of people who stand on street corners looking for work make up 0.02 percent of the state's total work force, according to the study by the Public Policy Institute of California, a San Francisco-based private research organization.
The institute is funded by private foundations and conducts research on various policy areas, including health, immigration, government and political participation.
The study appears to bear out other widespread perceptions about this population, including the fact that most of the workers-on-corners are Latino men with little formal education who are in the country illegally.
For many anti-illegal immigration activists, the term day laborer has become synonymous with illegal immigrant.
Arturo Gonzalez, a research fellow with the Public Policy Institute of California who wrote the report, said, "The issue probably attracts so much public and policy attention because its informal nature means that work is solicited in busy public places -- making workers very conspicuous in local communities," Gonzalez said.
Large groups of day laborers can be found in nearly every community in North County. They have made headlines in recent years when anti-illegal immigration groups, such as the San Diego Minutemen and others, have formed in large part to protest the day labor sites.
Day laborers have said they gather in street corners because they can't find work elsewhere for various reasons, including their status as illegal immigrants.
Others say they want to supplement their income from regular jobs, while others say they receive higher pay by working as day laborers.
Activists who oppose day labor sites say most of the workers who gather are illegal immigrants breaking labor laws and bringing down the quality of life in communities across North County.
Most recently, these groups began targeting St. Peter's Catholic Church in Fallbrook, where workers have gathered for more than 15 years.
"Aiding and abetting in the violation of our federal immigration laws, as is being done by St. Peter's Catholic Church of Fallbrook by facilitating an illegal day-laborer hiring site, is a violation of God's laws that state 'everyone must submit himself to the governing authorities,' " Neil Turner, a Carlsbad anti-illegal immigration activist, said in a recent written statement.
According to the study, 80 percent of the estimated 40,000 day laborers in California are working in the state without legal documentation, such as visas or work permits.
About 68 percent of them are from Mexico, 29 percent of them are from other parts of Latin America and about 3 percent were born in the United States.
Gonzalez said he culled information from the National Day Labor Survey conducted in 2004 for his study. The nationwide survey questioned 2,660 day laborers in 139 municipalities and 20 states. The survey was paid by foundation grants and conducted by researchers from three universities, including UCLA.
The work offers above-minimum-wage pay but offers few hours on a weekly average, Gonzalez said. Many of the workers who were questioned in the survey said they are either looking for permanent work or are looking to supplement their earnings from a permanent job, he said.
Day laborers earn on average about $11 an hour but average a weekly total of about $260, primarily because they average about 23 hours of work per week, according to the study. The study reports that day laborers make up about 3 percent of the state's male illegal immigrant work force.
One of the opponents of the day labor sites questioned the study's credibility.
"For every study you present, I can give you 10," said Ray Carney, a Fallbrook resident and anti-illegal immigration activist. "I don't take any credence in what some Ph.D. says. ... Illegal immigration does depress wages and takes jobs from undereducated Americans. Construction is a good example."
Claudia Smith, an immigrant rights advocate, said demographics at day labor sites vary day by day and place by place. Smith said she believes the reason day laborers attract protests reaches beyond the question of whether the workers are legal or illegal immigrants.
"It's never been about day laborers," Smith said. "And it certainly is not a question of whether they are documented or undocumented. It is about harassing a 'bunch of Mexicans.' If that is what you set out to do, it makes sense to target day laborers because they are the most exposed."
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: aliens; california; captainobvious; daylaborers; education; illegalimmigrants; immigrantlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
To: NormsRevenge
There are lies, damned lies and then there are statistics.
2
posted on
07/26/2007 7:05:19 PM PDT
by
Nachum
To: NormsRevenge
Well gooooolley! I’m just amazed at this. Illegals standing around at day centers are uneducated. Who’d a thunck it.
3
posted on
07/26/2007 7:07:23 PM PDT
by
ontap
(Just another backstabbing conservative)
To: Nachum
It took a STUDY to figure this out? Who’s the dumb one?
To: NormsRevenge
It's time the following federal law be strictly enforced.
Federal Immigration and Nationality Act
Section 8 USC 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv)(b)(iii) Recruitment and Employment of Illegal Aliens Encouraging and Harboring Illegal Aliens Enforcement RICO Citizen Recourse Tax Crimes Comment
Section 8 USC 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv)(b)(iii) "Any person who . . . encourages or induces an illegal alien to . . . reside . . . knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such . . . residence is . . . in violation of law, shall be punished as provided . . . for each illegal alien in respect to whom such a violation occurs . . . fined under title 18 . . . imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both."
Section 274 felonies under the federal Immigration and Nationality Act, INA 274A(a)(1)(A):
A person (including a group of persons, business, organization, or local government) commits a federal felony when she or he:
· assists an illegal alien s/he should reasonably know is illegally in the U.S. or who lacks employment authorization, by transporting, sheltering, or assisting him or her to obtain employment, or · encourages that illegal alien to remain in the U.S. by referring him or her to an employer or by acting as employer or agent for an employer in any way, or · knowingly assists illegal aliens due to personal convictions. ·
Penalties upon conviction include criminal fines, imprisonment, and forfeiture of vehicles and real property used to commit the crime. Anyone employing or contracting with an illegal alien without verifying his or her work authorization status is guilty of a misdemeanor. Aliens and employers violating immigration laws are subject to arrest, detention, and seizure of their vehicles or property. In addition, individuals or entities who engage in racketeering enterprises that commit (or conspire to commit) immigration-related felonies are subject to private civil suits for treble damages and injunctive relief.
Recruitment and Employment of Illegal Aliens
It is unlawful to hire an alien, to recruit an alien, or to refer an illegal alien for a fee, knowing the illegal alien is unauthorized to work in the United States. It is equally unlawful to continue to employ an illegal alien knowing that the illegal alien is unauthorized to work.
It is unlawful to hire any individual for employment in the United States without complying with employment eligibility verification requirements. Requirements include examination of identity documents and completion of Form I-9 for every employee hired. Employers must retain all I-9s, and, with three days' advance notice, the forms must be made available for inspection. Employment includes any service or labor performed for any type of remuneration within the United States, with the exception of sporadic domestic service by an individual in a private home. "Day laborers" or other casual workers engaged in any compensated activity (with the above exception) are employees for purposes of immigration law. An employer includes an agent or anyone acting directly or indirectly in the interest of the employer. For purposes of verification of authorization to work, employer also means an independent contractor, or a contractor other than the person using the illegal alien labor.
The use of temporary or short-term contracts cannot be used to circumvent the employment authorization verification requirements. If employment is to be for less than the usual three days allowed for completing the I-9 Form requirement, the form must be completed immediately at the time of hire.
An employer has constructive knowledge that an employee is an illegal unauthorized worker if a reasonable person would infer it from the facts. Constructive knowledge constituting a violation of federal law has been found where (1) the I-9 employment eligibility form has not been properly completed, including supporting documentation, (2) the employer has learned from other individuals, media reports, or any source of information available to the employer that the alien is unauthorized to work, or (3) the employer acts with reckless disregard for the legal consequences of permitting a third party to provide or introduce an illegal alien into the employer's work force. Knowledge cannot be inferred solely on the basis of an individual's accent or foreign appearance.
Actual specific knowledge is not required. For example, a newspaper article stating that ballrooms depend on an illegal alien work force of dance hostesses was held by the courts to be a reasonable ground for suspicion that unlawful conduct had occurred.
It is illegal for nonprofit or religious organizations to knowingly assist an employer to violate employment sanctions, regardless of claims that their convictions require them to assist illegal aliens. Harboring or aiding illegal aliens is not protected by the First Amendment. It is a felony to establish a commercial enterprise for the purpose of evading any provision of federal immigration law. Violators may be fined or imprisoned for up to five years.
Encouraging and Harboring Illegal Aliens
It is a violation of law for any person to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection in any place, including any building or means of transportation, any illegal alien who is in the United States in violation of law. Harboring means any conduct that tends to substantially facilitate an alien to remain in the U.S. illegally. The sheltering need not be clandestine, and harboring covers aliens arrested outdoors, as well as in a building. This provision includes harboring an alien who entered the U.S. legally but has since lost his legal status.
An employer can be convicted of the felony of harboring illegal aliens who are his employees if he takes actions in reckless disregard of their illegal status, such as ordering them to obtain false documents, altering records, obstructing INS inspections, or taking other actions that facilitate the alien's illegal employment. Any person who within any 12-month period hires ten or more individuals with actual knowledge that they are illegal aliens or unauthorized workers is guilty of felony harboring. It is also a felony to encourage or induce an alien to come to or reside in the U.S. knowing or recklessly disregarding the fact that the alien's entry or residence is in violation of the law. This crime applies to any person, rather than just employers of illegal aliens. Courts have ruled that "encouraging" includes counseling illegal aliens to continue working in the U.S. or assisting them to complete applications with false statements or obvious errors. The fact that the alien is a refugee fleeing persecution is not a defense to this felony, since U.S. law and the UN Protocol on Refugees both require that a refugee must report to immigration authorities without delay upon entry to the U.S.
The penalty for felony harboring is a fine and imprisonment for up to five years. The penalty for felony alien smuggling is a fine and up to ten years' imprisonment. Where the crime causes serious bodily injury or places the life of any person in jeopardy, the penalty is a fine and up to twenty years' imprisonment. If the criminal smuggling or harboring results in the death of any person, the penalty can include life imprisonment. Convictions for aiding, abetting, or conspiracy to commit alien smuggling or harboring, carry the same penalties. Courts can impose consecutive prison sentences for each alien smuggled or harbored. A court may order a convicted smuggler to pay restitution if the illegal alien smuggled qualifies as a victim under the Victim and Witness Protection Act. Conspiracy to commit crimes of sheltering, harboring, or employing illegal aliens is a separate federal offense punishable by a fine of up to $10,000 or five years' imprisonment.
Enforcement
A person or entity having knowledge of a violation or potential violation of employer sanctions provisions may submit a signed written complaint to the INS office with jurisdiction over the business or residence of the potential violator, whether an employer, employee, or agent. The complaint must include the names and addresses of both the complainant and the violator, and detailed factual allegations, including date, time, and place of the potential violation, and the specific conduct alleged to be a violation of employer sanctions. By regulation, the INS will only investigate third-party complaints that have a reasonable probability of validity. Designated INS officers and employees, and all other officers whose duty it is to enforce criminal laws, may make an arrest for violation of smuggling or harboring illegal aliens.
State and local law enforcement officials have the general power to investigate and arrest violators of federal immigration statutes without prior INS knowledge or approval, as long as they are authorized to do so by state law. There is no extant federal limitation on this authority. The 1996 immigration control legislation passed by Congress was intended to encourage states and local agencies to participate in the process of enforcing federal immigration laws. Immigration officers and local law enforcement officers may detain an individual for a brief warrantless interrogation where circumstances create a reasonable suspicion that the individual is illegally present in the U.S. Specific facts constituting a reasonable suspicion include evasive, nervous, or erratic behavior; dress or speech indicating foreign citizenship; and presence in an area known to contain a concentration of illegal aliens. Hispanic appearance alone is not sufficient. Immigration officers and police must have a valid warrant or valid employer's consent to enter workplaces or residences. Any vehicle used to transport or harbor illegal aliens, or used as a substantial part of an activity that encourages illegal aliens to come to or reside in the U.S. may be seized by an immigration officer and is subject to forfeiture. The forfeiture power covers any conveyances used within the U.S.
RICO Citizen Recourse
Private persons and entities may initiate civil suits to obtain injunctions and treble damages against enterprises that conspire to or actually violate federal alien smuggling, harboring, or document fraud statutes, under the Racketeer-Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO). The pattern of racketeering activity is defined as commission of two or more of the listed crimes. A RICO enterprise can be any individual legal entity, or a group of individuals who are not a legal entity but are associated in fact, and can include nonprofit associations.
Tax Crimes
Employers who aid or abet the preparation of false tax returns by failing to pay income or Social Security taxes for illegal alien employees, or who knowingly make payments using false names or Social Security numbers, are subject to IRS criminal and civil sanctions. U.S. nationals who have suffered intentional discrimination because of citizenship or national origin by an employer with more than three employees may file a complaint within 180 days of the discriminatory act with the Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices, U.S. Department of Justice. In addition to the federal statutes summarized, state laws and local ordinances controlling fair labor practices, workers compensation, zoning, safe housing and rental property, nuisance, licensing, street vending, and solicitations by contractors may also apply to activities that involve illegal aliens.
Comment:
A comment and a published quote by Robert Gaffney, Attorney and County Executive of Suffolk County, LI, NY:
The statutory foundation of United States immigration law has always been the jurisdiction of the federal government, Congress and the federal courts. The preeminent laws concerning the employment of illegal aliens are found in the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. §~ 1101-1503), as amended by the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 CIRCA).
The law states it is a crime to assist an illegal alien who lacks employment authorization by referring him to an employer, or by acting as his or her employer, or as an agent for an employer. 8 U.S.C.S. § 1324a(a)(1)(A) (Lexis 1997). Furthermore, it is unlawful to hire an individual for employment without complying with the employment eligibility requirements for every person hired. 8 U.S.C.S. § 1324a(a)(l)(B) (Lexis 1997). Moreover, conduct tending substantially to facilitate illegal aliens remaining in the United States illegally, where there is knowledge or a reckless disregard of an illegal alien s unlawful status, is a crime, with escalating penalties, encompassed within the provisions of 1324. 8 U.S.C.S. § 1324(a)(l)(A)(iii) (Lexis 1997); United States v. Kim. 193 F-3d 567 (2d Cir. 1999), are considered employees for purposes of immigration law.
5
posted on
07/26/2007 7:08:55 PM PDT
by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
To: ontap; Borax Queen
Well gooooolley! Im just amazed at this. Illegals standing around at day centers are uneducated. Whod a thunck it. I would never have known this had they not spent thousands of dollars, likely U.S. taxpayer monies, on this study. /s
6
posted on
07/26/2007 7:10:47 PM PDT
by
nicmarlo
To: NormsRevenge
Day laborers uneducated????
I’m stuned, I tell ya...series!
7
posted on
07/26/2007 7:11:47 PM PDT
by
rottndog
(Government is a necessary evil, but as with all evils, the less of it the better.)
To: NormsRevenge
It is about harassing a 'bunch of Mexicans.' That's right - Mexicans, not U.S. citizens.
8
posted on
07/26/2007 7:12:55 PM PDT
by
glorgau
To: NormsRevenge
I wonder if they could tell me which direction the sun will rise from in the a.m.
9
posted on
07/26/2007 7:12:59 PM PDT
by
ConservaTexan
(February 6, 1911)
To: nicmarlo
A short trip by Home Depot, and a few questions would have saved CA. a lot of money.
10
posted on
07/26/2007 7:13:35 PM PDT
by
doc1019
(Fred Thompson '08)
To: nicmarlo
I would never have known this had they not spent thousands of dollars, likely U.S. taxpayer monies, on this study. /s
Nope:
"according to the study by the Public Policy Institute of California, a San Francisco-based private research organization.
The institute is funded by private foundations and conducts research on various policy areas, including health, immigration, government and political participation. "
11
posted on
07/26/2007 7:13:51 PM PDT
by
rottndog
(Government is a necessary evil, but as with all evils, the less of it the better.)
To: NormsRevenge
Wnat? I thought my gardener at least had a Masters if not a PhD?
To: rottndog
Private research organization also received grants from the U.S. government....taxpayer dollars. I wouldn’t be surprised if they received some of that for this study.
13
posted on
07/26/2007 7:16:29 PM PDT
by
nicmarlo
To: ConservaTexan
They make up 1% of the workforce, but 100% of the illegal immigrant day labor force.
BTW, I like your tagline reference to the Gipper’s birthday. I’m just starting The Reagan Diaries.
I still love that man.
14
posted on
07/26/2007 7:16:35 PM PDT
by
exit82
(I have a gut feeling: Michael Chertoff is a jerk.)
To: doc1019
Truly, this one is a no brainer.
15
posted on
07/26/2007 7:16:58 PM PDT
by
nicmarlo
To: NormsRevenge
The number of people who stand on street corners looking for work make up 0.02 percent of the state's total work force, according to the study by the Public Policy Institute of California, a San Francisco-based private research organization.The ol' "dazzle 'em with BULLSHIT* approach?
What percentage it might or might not be is irrelevant.
What is the actual number? How many family members (not in the work force) become invisible?
Give me a break!
Another way to look at it, if there's only 1000 of them, why do they consume $2 billion (with a "B") worth of welfare, free healthcare and education each year??
*BULLSHIT
16
posted on
07/26/2007 7:20:22 PM PDT
by
Publius6961
(MSM: Israelis are killed by rockets; Lebanese are killed by Israelis.)
To: NormsRevenge
Well damn if they had sent me have of the money they spent, I would have told them!
17
posted on
07/26/2007 7:21:00 PM PDT
by
org.whodat
(What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
To: nicmarlo
You’re probably right....especially with the dumbocrats ruling Kalifornia. I wouldn’t be surprised on bit if public monies have somehow been funneled to this organization.
18
posted on
07/26/2007 7:21:05 PM PDT
by
rottndog
(Government is a necessary evil, but as with all evils, the less of it the better.)
To: rottndog
Many of these “private” organizations hire grant writers.
They’d never want to spend their own monies on anything like this study. : )
19
posted on
07/26/2007 7:22:53 PM PDT
by
nicmarlo
To: exit82
February 6 should be a national holiday. I just started the diaries myself.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson