She did nothing to warrant her removal. She asked her question, then remained silent. She started her tirage only after they grabbed her.
I find no fault with the First Ammendment, even for people you assume to be kooks. I do have great trouble with the perceived need to remove a person because of the nature of a question. That speaks volumes, and appears to be damage control.
>> She did nothing to warrant her removal. She asked her question, then remained silent. She started her tirage only after they grabbed her.
I find no fault with the First Ammendment, even for people you assume to be kooks. I do have great trouble with the perceived need to remove a person because of the nature of a question. That speaks volumes, and appears to be damage control.<<
Kooks get their rights, no argument.
What she said was “they are asking me to leave.”
In general, a private citizen or non credentialed member of the press cannot interrupt a Presidential candidate talking to the press without being asked to leave.
Now, what they do from that point determines what happens. I suspect that if she had done more than scream conspiracies and refuse to leave Fred has security sufficient to have gotten violent.