“I’m not voting for anyone working to eradicate our borders and erase our identity.”
You do know that the CFR is essentiallly Hardball for policy wonks, right? People from opposite sides of the spectrum debate politely at CFR conferences.
Sliming any given member of the CFR with what another member says is like smearing Reagan with what Carter says because they were on the same stage at a debate.
Just for example, the foul NAU piece from one task force had a direct, opposite, response from build-the-wall-yesterday Tom Tancredo. (The links are above.)
Is that the new catch phrase for this group? I've been seeing it lately on FR.
Gay unions don't really mean gay marriage, right?