[perfect_rovian_storm]

You have got to be kidding. Please tell me you are.

Are you actually maintaining that private people removing a person who is clearly causing a disturbance is a violation of someone’s constitutional rights? Have you bothered to actually read the constitution to check on that one?

If you did indeed watch that video and didn’t have the mute button on, you couldn’t miss the disturbance the woman caused AFTER she was ASKED to leave.

I don’t know what kind of Fred supporter you are, but if this is an example of the kind of slipshod thinking that you use to determine what candidate to support, I hear there’s a former Mass. governor with really great hair that’s waiting for your $10 check. Either that or you should refrain from posting while drinking.

[no dems]

private people removing a person who is clearly causing a disturbance

C'mon, you know she was not causing a disturbance until, as you yourself said, AFTER she was asked to leave. I'd have caused a disturbance myself if I was treated the way she was. AND, SHE WAS NOT REMOVED BY "PRIVATE PEOPLE"; she was removed by the police, at the request of whom, I don't know. What's wrong with you people? If she had done this to Hillary Clinton, you'd be cheering her.

And, you, p_r_s should know from my prior posts that I am truly a Fred supporter. I just believe in Free Speech. Listen, Fred will get worse treatment than this from David Gregory and the White House Press Corp. Time to "man up".