Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: libs_kma

I’m not sure what really disturbs me more. That the moronic judge was allowed to sue for $54 million, or even get a judge to permit this within their court, or the fact that defending against such a lawsuit required $83,000 in legal fees.


4 posted on 07/25/2007 11:53:37 AM PDT by kingu (No, I don't use sarcasm tags - it confuses people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: kingu

The judge should have made an award of “reasonable” attorneys’ fees. Depending on hourly rate and number of hours, this $83,000 could very well be termed reasonable. I would assume they have itemized fee statements to back it up. The judge should definitely should make the plaintiff pay the defendants’ attorneys’ fees.


5 posted on 07/25/2007 12:00:30 PM PDT by Right Cal Gal (Remember Billy Dale!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson