It’s never a good idea to get the gov’t involved. This is likely a dispute between former city slickers and longtime hunters which would be resolved easily if the city slicker learned some country manners.
A simple walk outside and a chat with the offending dog owners should do the trick, or just post the property for no hunting and enforce it.
I read the full article and it sounded to me that a city snob didn’t like that hunting dogs came on his property and barked.
I doubt its about actual hunting on his private property.
In most states you can’t hunt without permission but dogs may cross private land and hunters have a right to retrieve them if they are unarmed and not in pursuit of game.
City snobs should stay in the city or learn to deal with hunting dogs that may cross their property line.