Skip to comments.
Obama Debate Comments Set Off Firestorm
AP ^
| 07/24/2007
| TOM RAUM
Posted on 07/24/2007 2:35:34 PM PDT by Phlap
Barack Obama's offer to meet without precondition with leaders of renegade nations such as Cuba, North Korea and Iran touched off a war of words, with rival Hillary Rodham Clinton calling him naive and Obama linking her to President Bush's diplomacy.
Older politicians in both parties questioned the wisdom of such a course, while Obama's supporters characterized it as a repudiation of Bush policies of refusing to engage with certain adversaries.
It triggered a round of competing memos and statements Tuesday between the chief Democratic presidential rivals. Obama's team portrayed it as a bold stroke; Clinton supporters saw it as a gaffe that underscored the freshman senator's lack of foreign policy experience.
...
Anthony Lake defended Obama's statements.
"A great nation and its president should never fear negotiating with anyone and Senator Obama rightly said he would be willing to do sojust as Richard Nixon did with China and Ronald Reagan with the Soviet Union," Lake said.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Politics/Elections; US: Illinois; US: New York
KEYWORDS: democrats; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Nixon and Regan and ... Obama? I don't think so.
1
posted on
07/24/2007 2:35:35 PM PDT
by
Phlap
To: Phlap
apparently obama failed to dislodge her highness from her perch.
2
posted on
07/24/2007 2:36:21 PM PDT
by
ken21
( b 4 fred.)
To: Phlap
It is just a jobs issue, unions are not going to like the idea of any dim painting the image that anyone can do anything all by them self.
To: Phlap
I sincerely hope that they politically bloody each other so badly that neither lightweight gets more than 33% of the vote.
4
posted on
07/24/2007 2:39:25 PM PDT
by
kromike
To: Phlap
5
posted on
07/24/2007 2:40:11 PM PDT
by
kinoxi
To: Phlap
Obama’s remarks show how little experience he has with foreign policy, and how little he knows about the historical actions of these nations toward the U.S.
6
posted on
07/24/2007 2:40:41 PM PDT
by
MEGoody
(Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
To: Phlap
"It triggered a round of competing memos and statements Tuesday between the chief Democratic presidential rivals. Obama's team portrayed it as a bold stroke; Clinton supporters saw it as a gaffe that underscored the freshman senator's lack of foreign policy experience."
As opposed to YOUR vast foreign policy experience Hitlery? FOAD, the both of you.
7
posted on
07/24/2007 2:41:07 PM PDT
by
stm
To: Phlap
Obama... the Magic Negro Jimmy Carter!
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
8
posted on
07/24/2007 2:42:02 PM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: MEGoody
Obamas remarks show how little experience he has with foreign policy Now, where did we hear THAT before? Oh, yeah, the man "lacks gravitas" too.
9
posted on
07/24/2007 2:43:07 PM PDT
by
ssaftler
(Beware the Reverend L. Ron Gore and his Church of Climatology.)
To: Phlap
"The Obama campaign, meanwhile, circulated a memo by Obama spokesman Bill Burton saying Obama's response to the question had played well with focus groups and that Clinton had changed her position on the subjecta claim her campaign denied."
ROFLMAO!!!! This pitiful Obama campaign actually cited "played well with focus groups" in defense of a supposed major foreign policy initiative with evil dictators??? This guy really is a joke....... and having Tony Lake (one of the worst national security officials in US history) defend your foreign policy expertise is not exactly a sound move with people who actually know anything.
10
posted on
07/24/2007 2:45:21 PM PDT
by
Enchante
(Reid and Pelosi Defeatocrats: Surrender Now - Peace for Our Time!!)
To: Phlap
I’m not an Obama supporter. But I don’t see what would be wrong with talking to the leaders of other nations — even nutball nations like N Korea. What’s to lose?
To: goldstategop
That was my thought exactly, this SOB and dennis The menace Kucinich both sound like Jimmy Carter.
12
posted on
07/24/2007 2:49:34 PM PDT
by
Americanexpat
(A strong democracy through citizen oversight.)
To: ObadiahLynch
If they’re going to do it... it needs to be televised live on CNN, FOX, MSNBC, and the networks. That’s the only way the american tax payer will get out of giving North Korea or Iran billions and billions more dollars. Giving away money (pork) is the only way ANY of our politicians know how to operate.
13
posted on
07/24/2007 2:49:46 PM PDT
by
kjam22
(see me play the guitar here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=noHy7Cuoucc)
Remember this mud-slinging after one gets the nomination, and the other is listed as VP candidate. Then they can gather around singing kumbaya (at least until they’re sworn in and trying to assassinate each other, literally).
14
posted on
07/24/2007 2:51:21 PM PDT
by
svanni
To: Enchante
This pitiful Obama campaign actually cited "played well with focus groups" in defense of a supposed major foreign policy initiative with evil dictators??? He has a smaller internal compass than either of the Clintons? Who would have thought?!
15
posted on
07/24/2007 2:53:08 PM PDT
by
Tamar1973
(Riding the Korean Wave, one BYJ movie at a time! (http://www.byj.co.kr))
To: Phlap
First we send a Ping Pong team to China. Then we send Nixon to China. Then Clinton sold us out to China. Now China is in a massive Military buildup (with the USA in their cross hairs). Talking has failed us. Trust but do not bother to verify. We should have stuck to the Ping Pong diplomacy, even if they cleaned our plow in the game.
16
posted on
07/24/2007 2:53:12 PM PDT
by
CHEE
(Shoot low, they're crawling.)
To: CHEE
17
posted on
07/24/2007 2:54:34 PM PDT
by
counterpunch
("The Democrats are the party of slavery." - Cindy Sheehan)
To: svanni
yep.... team democrat is going to be Hillary an Obama... or Obama and Hillary. No doubt.
18
posted on
07/24/2007 2:54:50 PM PDT
by
kjam22
(see me play the guitar here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=noHy7Cuoucc)
To: kjam22
Sounds like you know the Clintons..MO...Be sure
that you let your friends know. Clinton’s will sell
their best friends down the river or...maybe just
take them to a park..as has happened before !! JK
To: ObadiahLynch
"Whats to lose?"
We can have any lower level and back channel talks with them we want to..... it's foolish to have the US President waste time and credibility trying to talk with scumbags who are only trying to score propaganda points (and I'm not only referring to Demagogue congresscreatures!!). IF and when other channels indicate there is actually something to be gained by having the US President meet with one or more of the scumbags, then it can be considered..... but a blanket "in my first year in office I will hold unconditional talks with all of the world's worst regimes" is just a foolish waste of time and undermines the presidential role in truly significant endeavors (any president can be made to look weak and foolish by vicious dictators playing games with such bilateral meetings)..... besides which the scumbags do not merit any undeserved credibility and standing in the world which they will gain from being invited to meet with "The Great Satan."
20
posted on
07/24/2007 2:58:50 PM PDT
by
Enchante
(Reid and Pelosi Defeatocrats: Surrender Now - Peace for Our Time!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson