At first I didn’t support the action of the FEC, but now I realize why DK is subject to it. We raise money here at FR to run the site and promote the site. DK is a CONDUIT directly to the DNC coffers. It’s like those union run sites that call themselves things like “Americans for Change” but are really donation sites to directly aid democrat candidates and to directly DAMAGE republican candidates. To the best of my knowledge Jim Robinson isn’t using this site as an RNC fundraiser.
>>At first I didn’t support the action of the FEC, but now I realize why DK is subject to it. We raise money here at FR to run the site and promote the site. DK is a CONDUIT directly to the DNC coffers. It’s like those union run sites that call themselves things like “Americans for Change” but are really donation sites to directly aid democrat candidates and to directly DAMAGE republican candidates. To the best of my knowledge Jim Robinson isn’t using this site as an RNC fundraiser.<<
What do you mean by conduit? Freepers certainly help conservative candidates and sometimes band together in groups to do it.
If KOS gives money directly to candidates that could be different but if the site just supports candidates verbally and the members involvement with candidates is an independent action then I would think Freep would be similarly vulnerable to attacks.
OTOH, I am not aware that KOS is open about their budget the way
Freep is but as far as I know
KOS only discloses their hosting cost: $7000 a month or nearly three times as high as Freep so who knows what they do