but, then I'd have to kill you.
It seems to be more leaky than secretive.
THANK GOD they are secretive! Or thought to be so. The liberals (commies) would have our enemies knowing EVERYTHING.
How quickly they for get Hillerycare and all the other secrets from the Clinton regime.
Let’s see... we’re at war with people who use propaganda and terrorism as weapons. I wish the Bush Administration could have been as secretive as the Roosevelt Administration. Now we have more people hating Bush than OBL. Who’s winning?
could it be we are in a real, an actual war, and not everything is for public consumption?
Coincidence that all who are complaining are liberal or “hate” or are highly critical of the Bush Administration?
Just an observation.
Who hired Craig Livingstone?
What happened to the hard drives in the Travel Office?
The four federal agents killed at Waco used to be whose bodyguard?
The Rose Law Firm billing records were found where?
I’m sorry I’m afraid I cannot recall at the moment.
Reporters like to be spoon-fed the news. If they aren’t, they accuse “the Authorities” of being secretive.
translation, reporters don’t get leaks.
I like the literary montage.
However this is rich considering the NYT would keep Harry Potter’s secrets but not the real world military secrets.
Given the pro-terrorist scum complaining, one can only feel better at knowing that the administration is secretive! Gimme a break and let’s talk about how open Hitlery’s admninstration would be (man the thought is so scary I’m almost missing Bubba!!!! OK never mind, this is getting me confused! ;-)))
there was the u.s. state department of the truman admin, riddled with leftover commies from the fdr enlightenment,
that gave u.s. military secrets to the chicoms during the korean war,
often before our troops on the ground had even gotten their orders.
richard nixon rightfully was wary of the the state department, and left them out of a lot of his decision making.
so, the bush admin is just pragmatic.
“Secret” about what?
Those scumbag liberals have a chance to ask questions every day.
The reason the liberals distnguish this administration from rat administrations is because they don’t ask Democrat administrations the same kind of questions they ask Republicans. For example, I don’t recall them asking the obvious: “President Clinton, FBI experts say that your use of the ‘lip-biting’ technique to paralyze your rape victim, Juanita Broaddrick, is an indication that you are likely a serial rapist. How do you respond?”
Bush should fire the person in charge of secrets. They were all published on the front page of the N Y Times.
Clinton used to diddle the reporter-ettes on the road. They’re just mad that President Bush doesn’t do the same.
This "moderate" and "compassionate" relabeling of RINO's has done more damage to our Constitution than we ever should have allowed.
I wonder if she had got the plans for D-Day (WWII) she would have given them to the NAZI’S. What a witch.
If this administration is so secretive as these useful idiots claim, then why is this administration garnering so much condemnation on specific items being reported constantly? I would think that “secrecy” would mean noone knows about what the administration has been doing.