Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

We are gouging oil companies – and ourselves
Ayn Rand Institute via High Springs Herald ^ | July 23, 2007 | David Holcberg

Posted on 07/23/2007 6:17:52 AM PDT by Daffynition

The U.S. House of Representatives recently passed legislation instituting penalties of up to $150 million for companies and up to $2 million and 10 years' imprisonment for individuals found guilty of gasoline "price gouging."

But the real gouger driving up gasoline prices is not the private sector – it is our government.

To "gouge" means to extort, to take by force – something that oil companies and gas stations have no power to do. Unlike a government, which can forcibly take away its citizens' money and dictate their behavior, an oil company can only make us an offer to buy its products, which we are free to reject.

Because sellers must gain the voluntary consent of buyers, and because the market allows freedom of competition, oil and gasoline prices are set, not by the whim of companies, but by economic factors such as supply and demand.

If oil companies could set prices at will, surely they would have charged higher prices in the 1990s, when gasoline was under one dollar a gallon.

Because oil companies and gas stations cannot set their prices arbitrarily, they must make their profits by earning them – by efficiently producing something that we value and are eager to buy. In so doing, they assume great risks and expend enormous effort.

Over the decades, oil companies have created a huge infrastructure to produce and distribute gasoline by investing hundreds of billions of dollars in prospecting, drilling, transporting, stocking and refining oil.

In the absence of political factors like the 1973 OPEC oil embargo or the Gulf wars, the net effect of oil companies' pursuit of profit has been to drive the price of oil and gasoline, not up, but down.

The price of a gallon of gasoline (in 2006 dollars) fell from $3 in the early 1920s to $2.50 in the 1940s to $2 in the 1960s to under $1.50 in the 1990s.

This downward trend is all the more impressive because it required the discovery and exploration of previously inaccessible sources of oil and because it persisted despite massive taxation and increased government regulation of the oil industry.

When we see the price of gasoline today, we should not accuse oil companies of gouging but rather thank them that prices are not much higher.

The true culprit that we should condemn for driving up prices is the government, which has engaged – with popular support – in the gouging of both the producers and consumers of gasoline.

Federal and state governments have long viewed gasoline taxes as a cash cow. In 2003, for instance, when the average retail price for a gallon of gasoline was $1.56, federal and state taxes averaged about 40 cents a gallon – which amounts to a far higher tax rate, 34 percent, than we pay for almost any other product.

(Contrary to popular belief, gasoline taxes do not just pay for the roads we drive on; less than 60 percent of the gas tax-funded "Highway Trust Fund" goes toward highways.)

Along with high taxes, environmental regulations – justified in the name of protecting nature from human activity – have dramatically increased the production costs, and thus the price, of oil and gasoline.

The government, for example, has closed huge areas to oil drilling, including the uninhabited wilderness of ANWR and the out-of-sight waters over the Atlantic and Pacific continental shelves. This, of, course significantly reduces the domestic supply of oil.

The government also has passed onerous environmental regulations that make it uneconomical for many old refineries to keep producing (50 out of 194 refineries were shut down from 1990 to 2004) and discourage new refineries from being built (no major refinery has been built in the last 30 years).

Regulations such as these push the surviving refineries to operate at almost full capacity, creating a situation where any significant reduction in the production of some refineries (e.g., from a hurricane) cannot be compensated by increased production in others.

Exorbitant spikes in prices, which many attribute to oil companies' "gouging," are actually caused by government constraints.

If we want to stop the irrational forces that have been driving up the price of gasoline and our cost of living, we must demand that our elected officials eliminate the regulations and excessive taxes that restrict the producers of oil and gas.

It's past time to stop gouging oil companies – and ourselves.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: congress; energy; govwatch; taxes; votebolshevik2008
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-236 next last
To: TommyDale
I wasn’t aware that it was a requirement to understand all the economics of an industry to hold an opinion.

You're free to hold any opinions you want. You choose to espouse them on a public forum, and they show that you don't understand how commodity pricing works. You can complain about it, and blame it on the producers, and maybe you can convince a government agent to intervene and make the problem worse, but you may as well be complaining that the sun rises in the east. Prices for commodities rise faster than they fall. Its the nature of the beast and its especially true in a volatile (pardon the pun) market like gasoline. It has to do with the nature of cost accounting, the level of inventory carried by the various agents, and the flow of information about costs, prices and future supply & demand.

The general public doesn’t know and doesn’t care about the details.

Then they will get the government (and market, and oil prices) they deserve.

The stupidity of the electorate is why we are a republic and not a democracy. Unfortunately, it hasn't saved us.
41 posted on 07/23/2007 7:58:26 AM PDT by chrisser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale
they suddenly fixed it quickly

That part of the feeder line was shut down for several months while parts were ordered and delivered. TransAlaska Pipeline oil shipments were about 1/2 normal for that time.

42 posted on 07/23/2007 7:59:44 AM PDT by RightWhale (It's Brecht's donkey, not mine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: unixfox

The FDA APPROVES these drugs, but when the drug is found to be unsafe they blame it on the drug companies. Typical government, never accepting responsibility for the damage it does.

Their accounting is deplorable. Consider the loss of lives versus saving of lives caused by "X" drug. Drug X on net saves twice as many lives as it causes deaths. The FDA chooses over-caution because no FDA employees wants it in their files that drug X caused Y amount of deaths. In part their excuse is that a dead person can be identified by name. Whereas the specific people whose lives were saved is unknowable. In the end the FDA rejects the live-saving drug. 

Plus, there's a ton of politics in the FDA. It banned the artificial sweetener Saccharine based on lab test using rats. They fed the rats so much Saccharine the human equivalent would require a person to drink seven-hundred cans of diet soda a day. Heck, just seventy twelve-ounce cans (over six gallons) of plain water a day would probably kill a person. 

How many people with heart conditions suffered unnecessarily or died because of FDA politics.

43 posted on 07/23/2007 8:03:42 AM PDT by Zon (Honesty outlives the lie, spin and deception -- It always has -- It always will.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: chrisser
the level of inventory carried

BINGO....... Less inventory is less overhead, volatile trading, and higher prices.

44 posted on 07/23/2007 8:05:41 AM PDT by Realism (Some believe that the facts-of-life are open to debate.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale

Refineries don’t fake down time. They HATE unscheduled downtime. The prices rise, but the refinery with the downtime doesn’t win. It’s the other refineries that win.

There are two of most of everything at a refinery: two pumps per service, two filters, etc. But the few large pieces of equipment, like a coker, gas compressor, or boiler, are unspared. They are very capital intensive.


45 posted on 07/23/2007 8:15:47 AM PDT by Barney Gumble (A liberal is someone too broadminded to take his own side in a quarrel - Robert Frost)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Realism
Less inventory is less overhead, volatile trading, and higher prices.

Higher inventory means higher prices, because there is a holding cost associated with that inventory.

46 posted on 07/23/2007 8:20:18 AM PDT by Barney Gumble (A liberal is someone too broadminded to take his own side in a quarrel - Robert Frost)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale
I wasn’t aware that it was a requirement to understand all the economics of an industry to hold an opinion. The general public doesn’t know and doesn’t care about the details. They want the prices lower.

Which is why their opinion is basically worthless.

47 posted on 07/23/2007 8:21:29 AM PDT by weaponeer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: weaponeer
Which is why their opinion is basically worthless.

This is where consumer inspired government regulation comes into the picture.

48 posted on 07/23/2007 8:29:04 AM PDT by Realism (Some believe that the facts-of-life are open to debate.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Zon
You are soooooooooo right!
49 posted on 07/23/2007 8:30:58 AM PDT by gunnedah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Zon
You are soooooooooo right!
50 posted on 07/23/2007 8:30:59 AM PDT by gunnedah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale

The shame is that the government makes more off of oil than the oil companies...and they don’t do a thing for it.

The problems are manifold. We need new refineries. We need to drill in Alaska, the Gulf off of Florida...


51 posted on 07/23/2007 8:35:45 AM PDT by Tex Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale
I wasn’t aware that it was a requirement to understand all the economics of an industry to hold an opinion.

No, but such a lack of understanding may reduce an opinion's value significantly.

52 posted on 07/23/2007 8:43:32 AM PDT by Trailerpark Badass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Barney Gumble
Higher inventory means higher prices, because there is a holding cost associated with that inventory.

When you're dealing in a commodity with high cost variability, the holding cost is frequently a mere fraction of the cost fluctuation.

Additionally, as is often the case with a commodity, the volume of product sold is quite large and thus the holding cost per unit is correspondingly small.

Correspondingly, with high volume, the margin per unit is often also very small.

Those factors (among others) combine and result in the fluctuations in cost becoming the overriding factor in business decisions because they far eclipse everything else.
53 posted on 07/23/2007 8:46:14 AM PDT by chrisser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale; Bookwoman
Bookwoman is quite correct, but there's an additional -- and vital -- factor she did not mention.

Refiners do not keep a large permanent maintenance staff. The bulk of their maintenance crews are hired ad hoc and as needed in the spring and autumn maintenance seasons. Due to the volatility of employment in the ''oil patch'', large numbers of temp maintenance workers have left the industry.

Refiners therefore are in the position of fighting each other for crews. If a wildcard such as Katrina comes along, it makes this problem exponentially worse, because everybody wants the workers all at the same time.

Additionally, there is, as in practically every industry, a high degree of variance from company to company in the quality of their maintenance of capital equipment. The recent AK pipe leak? BPAmoco couldn't be bothered to run the pigs. Texas City still mostly down 18 months and counting since the big explosion? BPAmoco, again (although, to be fair, they've had problems getting crews). The Whiting IN outage? You got it, BPAmoco yet again. See a pattern yet? BP, even well prior to the Amoco purchase/merger, has for decades had indifferent-to-rotten maintenance. They just got away with it for a long time, but no more.

I won't even bother elabourating on the other principal cause of price spikes, to wit, how both market and government uncertainty increases price.

54 posted on 07/23/2007 8:49:45 AM PDT by SAJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nightingale2887; Smokin' Joe; thackney; Eric in the Ozarks; expat_panama; ...
We can only wish. The vast majority of people won't bother to learn/understand the basics of the industry.

FWIW, there are a number of FReepers in and around the industry and the markets (pinged above, and I've surely missed several) who spend quite a good deal of time explaining the whats, hows and whys of the industry. I'd like to think their efforts are raising the FReeper understanding of the industry.

55 posted on 07/23/2007 8:57:15 AM PDT by SAJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: chrisser
Exceptionally well said!

WTG, and FReegards!

56 posted on 07/23/2007 8:58:10 AM PDT by SAJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale

In your case, it appears there may be some evidence.


57 posted on 07/23/2007 9:08:01 AM PDT by gogeo (Democrats want to support the troops without actually being helpful to them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale
I wasn’t aware that it was a requirement to understand all the economics of an industry to hold an opinion...

It is, if you wish to be taken seriously.

58 posted on 07/23/2007 9:10:59 AM PDT by gogeo (Democrats want to support the troops without actually being helpful to them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale
I wasn’t aware that it was a requirement to understand all the economics of an industry to hold an opinion. The general public doesn’t know and doesn’t care about the details. They want the prices lower.

It seems like since, Katrina TRADERS have been using every excuse in the book. IF you are upset, you should at least be upset at the traders. The prices will eventually come down but not until after summer naturally. That is the time of the year the traders do their doom and gloom that all oil is going to be gone by the end of the summer.

59 posted on 07/23/2007 9:26:25 AM PDT by JackDanielsOldNo7 (On guard until the seal is broken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: chrisser

Due to the large volume being sold, the amount of inventory needed to help smooth out the highs and lows, is astronomical. Price fluctuations will end up causing higher prices, but holding more inventory isn’t the answer.


60 posted on 07/23/2007 11:27:03 AM PDT by Barney Gumble (A liberal is someone too broadminded to take his own side in a quarrel - Robert Frost)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-236 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson