Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SunkenCiv
I have yet to meet anyone who has found the remains of a bear that was not killed by human activity. (A self-proclaimed naturalist once told me that he finds puma skeletons frequently; if this is true, he has a skill that no field biologist even remotely approaches...

I've spent a lot (and I do mean a lot) of time in the fields and forests of the upper Midwest over the course of my life and I've found a young moose carcass taken down by wolves and that of a young buck whitetail. Both animals were in fairly recent states of decay and the smell is what led me to the moose. In addition, I've found numerous antlers in various states but ALL were severely gnawed by rodents. In a purely subjective opinion, I'd say the odds of an average hiker or hunter stumbling upon the remains of ANY animal was small to none. Nature, as this guy points out, soon erases all traces of even the biggest critters.
34 posted on 07/22/2007 5:31:16 AM PDT by WorkingClassFilth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: WorkingClassFilth

Exactly.


38 posted on 07/22/2007 8:04:45 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Profile updated Saturday, July 21, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: WorkingClassFilth; SunkenCiv
In a purely subjective opinion, I'd say the odds of an average hiker or hunter stumbling upon the remains of ANY animal was small to none. Nature, as this guy points out, soon erases all traces of even the biggest critters.

I would not go as far as your statement- It is not uncommon to find deer and elk kill sites (I am in the Rockies). It is less common to find a moose or bear though, as their populations are much smaller.

But I will defend your comment in it's general sense. In particular I would point out that a carcass is naturally disarticulated in a very short period of time- In the course of a couple weeks all that is left is scattered bone and hair.

With the exception of the skull (which is often times dragged away), and considering the natural bias against crypto-zoological creatures, I find it quite plausible that the remains of such a creature might be misidentified by the non-critical eye of a casual observer.

Even so, it is the skull that would stand against your statement. Skulls can last for years in the wild, and especially the skull of a large animal. It seems unlikely that a skull has not been found in all these years.

It is also unlikely that one has not been killed by a hunter, considering the notoriety such a kill would bring.

That being said:

Once while I was in the deep woods I was awakened by a long mournful cry that raised the hair on my neck. The cry was repeated twice more and then fell silent. For the life of me I do not know what made that eerie sound, but my normally fearless dog tried to crawl into the sleeping bag with me, and spent the remainder of the night huddled against me.

Something VERY out-of-the-ordinary was out there.

That experience leaves me open to the idea of Bigfoot's existence, even when considering the odds against it.

-Bruce

45 posted on 07/22/2007 10:35:12 AM PDT by roamer_1 (Build the fence. Enforce the law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson