To: Red Badger
If the thrust reversers were deactivated, would he not have actually been increasing his speed? I thought thrust reversers mean you gun your engines, but deflectors force the thrust into your direction of travel, slowing the aircraft. Instead, he was actually speeding up?
5 posted on
07/20/2007 10:34:27 AM PDT by
finnman69
(May Paris Hilton's plane crash into Britney Spears house while Lindsey Lohan is over doing coke)
To: finnman69; Red Badger
thrust reversers mean you gun your engines, but deflectors force the thrust into your direction of travel, slowing the aircraft. Instead, he was actually speeding up?by the time he crashed, the pilot must have figured out that his reversers weren't working, and all efforts to use them were counterproductive. But by the time he could figure that out, the crash was baked in the pudding.
8 posted on
07/20/2007 10:38:33 AM PDT by
conservatism_IS_compassion
(The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters except PR.)
To: finnman69
If the pilot was not aware of the deactivation, I think you are right. Even if he was, the absence of the thrust reversers would have made for a much longer landing roll.
9 posted on
07/20/2007 10:40:21 AM PDT by
Truth29
To: finnman69
I was thinking that as well. You would think that there would be somekind of indicator to warn the pilot beforehand.
I was just on one of these planes. Scary thoughts thinking of myself and fellow passengers strapped in and burning to a crisp.
10 posted on
07/20/2007 10:40:33 AM PDT by
mowowie
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson