Skip to comments.
Iran's Renewed Threats to Take Over the Arab Gulf States
IMRA/Institute for Contemporary Affairs ^
| July, 2007
| Lt. Col. (res.) Jonathan Dahoah-Halevi
Posted on 07/20/2007 8:17:54 AM PDT by SJackson
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
1
posted on
07/20/2007 8:17:57 AM PDT
by
SJackson
To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
If you'd like to be on this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.
High Volume. Articles on Israel can also be found by clicking on the Topic or Keyword Israel. or WOT [War on Terror]
----------------------------
2
posted on
07/20/2007 8:19:11 AM PDT
by
SJackson
(isolationism never was, never will be acceptable response to[expansionist] tyrannical governments)
To: SJackson
These guys won't let it happen:
3
posted on
07/20/2007 8:20:26 AM PDT
by
wastedyears
(Freedom is the right of all sentient beings - Peter Cullen as Optimus Prime)
To: wastedyears
Their political leaders might, though.
To: SJackson
The Iranians need a lesson in reality. They couldn’t take out Saddam, but they will take out the USA and ALL the Arab states! That’s a lot of work!
5
posted on
07/20/2007 8:50:54 AM PDT
by
Edgerunner
(If you won't let the military fight your battles, you will have to. Keep your powder dry...)
To: SJackson
6
posted on
07/20/2007 8:52:51 AM PDT
by
ASA Vet
(Iran should have ceased to exist on Nov 5, 1979, but we had no president then.)
To: SJackson
I like it! If the idiots in Iran think they can take on the rest of the Arab world PLUS THE USA (that puts more folks on the opposing team, you idiot)....
7
posted on
07/20/2007 9:01:12 AM PDT
by
TheBattman
(I've got TWO QUESTIONS for you....)
To: SJackson
I’ve been wondering whether Chavez’s crazy military purchases to thwart a US invasion are in fact being diverted to Iran. Reasonable or kooky?
8
posted on
07/20/2007 9:01:16 AM PDT
by
steveyp
To: SJackson
"Iran has territorial ambitions in the Persian Gulf and does not hide them.In its view, every region of the Gulf is essentially Persian and not Arab; moreover, a large Shiite population lives in the Gulf." Too bad Iran doesn't take it one step further, and drop the cult of Islam as it's totalitarian 'religion'.
Before the Muhammadan's invaded and conquered the Persians, they were Zoroastrians.
The Mullahs mafia won't go that far however, because then they would loose their grip on the brainwashed minions. FA population with the freedom to think independently and rationally would be disastrous to Islamic rulers.
To: SJackson
10
posted on
07/20/2007 9:17:18 AM PDT
by
PGalt
To: SJackson
There are some big surprises waiting for I ran in the Gulf States. Big and nasty.
11
posted on
07/20/2007 9:18:32 AM PDT
by
TexanToTheCore
(If it ain't Rugby or Bullriding, it's for girls.........................................)
To: SJackson
These nutjobs keep finding new ways to feel like they’re entitled to things. The muslims believe that the whole world is theirs, and we Khfir just haven’t submitted yet. Now the Iranians think the ME is theirs and just needs to be brought back in line.
When do we get to drop the pretense that we can ever work with these people?
12
posted on
07/20/2007 9:22:20 AM PDT
by
SlowBoat407
(It's never a good time to get sucked into an evil vortex.)
To: Edgerunner
"The Iranians need a lesson in reality. They couldnt take out Saddam, but they will take out the USA and ALL the Arab states! Thats a lot of work!" They didn't have nukes to take out Saddam at the time, if they did, you can bet Baghdad wouldn't exist today. That's the whole idea behind Iran's nuclear ambitions, to be able to threaten those Arab gulf states into surrendering to Iranian control. Basically it will be a war between Iran and it;s allies (Putin and many of the "stans") north of the Euphrates against the Arab states south of it.
It's the rise of a new Persian Empire. If Bible Prophecy is correct, They will succeed, and the destruction of Europe isn't far behind, and the destruction of Christs Church. The Rebel then declares himself a god.
All because we didn't have the will to do what was needed to be done now.
To: SJackson
very valuable information
14
posted on
07/20/2007 9:39:09 AM PDT
by
dennisw
To: PGalt
Thanks for the Saudi perspective.
15
posted on
07/20/2007 3:28:32 PM PDT
by
rmlew
(Build a wall, attrit the illegals, end the anchor babies, Americanize Immigrants)
To: rmlew
16
posted on
07/20/2007 3:34:59 PM PDT
by
PGalt
To: SJackson
It is foolish of the U.S. government to grant any legitimacy to the Iranian government by be willing to parley with them.
Didn't the 20th century teach anyone in Washington other than Ambassador Bolton the lessons of the futility of appeasement?
To: SJackson
correct.
the sunni arab hatred for shia persians and vice versa
often intecedes the hatred of both for israel, the united states, and europe.
18
posted on
07/20/2007 3:44:18 PM PDT
by
ken21
( b 4 fred.)
To: steveyp
Ive been wondering whether Chavezs crazy military purchases to thwart a US invasion are in fact being diverted to Iran. Reasonable or kooky?Given the players, reasonable.
19
posted on
07/20/2007 3:46:29 PM PDT
by
null and void
(We are a Nation of Laws... IGNORED Laws...)
To: SlowBoat407
When do we get to drop the pretense that we can ever work with these people?When the last liberal is beheaded.
20
posted on
07/20/2007 3:48:00 PM PDT
by
null and void
(We are a Nation of Laws... IGNORED Laws...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson