1 posted on
07/20/2007 8:06:06 AM PDT by
BGHater
To: BGHater
To: BGHater
London & Hong Kong love Sarbanes Oxley.
For everyone else, it’s a trainwreck.
3 posted on
07/20/2007 8:09:43 AM PDT by
NeoCaveman
(it's the end of the world as we know it)
To: BGHater
SOX = The IT Full-Employment Act
4 posted on
07/20/2007 8:10:21 AM PDT by
dfwgator
(The University of Florida - Still Championship U)
To: BGHater
Lemme see if I get this:
RP goes aginst the establishment.
RP proven correct.
Does this mean the establishment was wrong?
Or am I missing something?
5 posted on
07/20/2007 8:17:12 AM PDT by
Designer
(I'm just sayin')
To: BGHater
Maybe Ron Paul should vote to defund enforcement if Sarbox as well.
This guy is crazy and dangerous. His opposition to the war is one thing, but supporting a move to cut funding for our troops borders on, if it isn't already, criminal.
7 posted on
07/20/2007 8:26:47 AM PDT by
pnh102
To: BGHater
Way too much Ron Paul stuff being posted on this website. He’s only getting 1% or less right now folks. Get out of your fantasy world and get real. We have business to do. We have to decide on a real candidate who can get the job done and win the next election. 99% of those polled have repeatedly told you that Ron Paul is not that candidate.
To: BGHater
"Reform, or even repeal, of Sarbanes-Oxley remains one of my top priorities. Dr. Paul is my hero.
54 posted on
07/20/2007 11:17:33 AM PDT by
WhiteGuy
(GOP Congress - 16,000 earmarks costing US $50 billion in 2006 - PAUL2008)
To: All
Paul appears right last year.
80 posted on
09/30/2008 8:26:30 AM PDT by
Sybeck1
(I've got dibs on the third boxcar down............)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson