To: RaceBannon
Well, actually you've got it wrong.
Scientists couldn't find any evidence of an overlap, which was extremely puzzling, and attempted a whole bunch of unsatisfactory explanations. There was no generally accepted theory for why dinosaurs' ancestors disappeared if there wasn't an overlap.
But I love this creationist canard: on the one hand, you folks accuse scientists of sticking dogmatically to theories regardless of the evidence. On the other hand, you attack them for adjusting theories to fit the available evidence. So which is it?
4 posted on
07/20/2007 6:20:07 AM PDT by
Alter Kaker
(Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)
To: Alter Kaker
But I love this creationist canard: on the one hand, you folks accuse scientists of sticking dogmatically to theories regardless of the evidence. On the other hand, you attack them for adjusting theories to fit the available evidence. So which is it? Some folks just don't like science. I guess it comes up with inconvenient answers.
5 posted on
07/20/2007 6:37:12 AM PDT by
Coyoteman
(Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
To: Alter Kaker
It’s actually both; you stick to the false religion of evolution while constantly revising how it happened and when or how long it took
evolution is so fun, you can change the means to ANY zany postulate!
8 posted on
07/20/2007 7:39:48 AM PDT by
RaceBannon
(Innocent until proven guilty: The Pendleton 8...down to 3..GWB, we hardly knew ye...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson