To: John Farson
“Actually *declaring* war would be a start.”
But Ron Paul didn’t want to declare war on AlQaeda either. He wanted to issue Letters of Marque and Reprisal.
97 posted on
07/20/2007 5:48:21 AM PDT by
DugwayDuke
(A patriot will cast their vote in the manner most likely to deny power to democrats.)
To: DugwayDuke
But Ron Paul didnt want to declare war on AlQaeda either. We don't declare war on ideologies or cliques. Wars are decleared, by definition, on nation states.
100 posted on
07/20/2007 6:12:13 AM PDT by
DreamsofPolycarp
(Americans used to roar like lions for liberty. Now they bleat like sheep for security)
To: DugwayDuke
But Ron Paul didnt want to declare war on AlQaeda either. He wanted to issue Letters of Marque and Reprisal.
You can't declare a war on anything except a sovereign country. He voted to authorize the president to invade Afghanistan and take out the Taliban who were harboring and supporting Bin Laden, their old ally from the days of the Soviet invasion.
Ron Paul still supports the effort in Afghanistan and wants to go into the tribal areas of Pakistan to finish off Bin Laden and his top leadership who are almost certainly there.
You might just notice that Giuiliani is now taking that same position. So is the White House in statements just this week.
Too bad they didn't listen to Ron Paul before they made such a complete disaster out of Iraq and got 4000 of our noble troops killed, often from sheer incompetence and Rumsfeld's failure to put enough troops in there to complete their (misbegotten) mission.
107 posted on
07/20/2007 8:40:47 AM PDT by
George W. Bush
(Rudy: tough on terror, scared of Iowa)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson