Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: vbmoneyspender
And here is how Paul led off his statement opposing the Congressional Authorization. The very first reason he gave was that he didn't consider it a big deal that they were firing on our pilots on a routine basis. Apparently with Paul, we have to wait for our homeland to be attacked before we can legitimately go to war.

I gave you the answer to it. It did not require war. It required allowed pilots with nice large missiles and bombs to be allowed to shoot back without having to go through Mother May I's to do so. Hit them like that and it would stop. We needed to fish or cut bait in Iraq we did neither one. Now our military is tied up in Iraq as is a sizable portion of our resources and hey guess who decided that would be the perfect time to test us again? Two nations thousands of miles apart only now we have limited capabilities thanks to poor planning. Our best hope to take care of Iraq and Iran would have been to let them continue to beat the snot out of each other. Now they are united against us.

Someone failed to study M.E. culture both in the White House and state department which is actually running the war anyway. They will fight each other till an outsider fights one of them then they become quick friends till that war is over. Iraq and Iran hate each other but now hate us more.

I have a question. A United States Navy ship was fired upon and sailors died within months of the end of the Clinton term and beginning of the Bush term. Why did both Clinton and Bush let that slide? Is Yemen our friend? In 1981 they threatened an attack on the U.S. Navy. No they were not friends to our Navy but trade friends. Which is why using a U.S. Navy ship for a stupid diplomatic reason got sailors killed. They didn't even need the fuel.

67 posted on 07/20/2007 2:42:39 AM PDT by cva66snipe (Proud Partisan Constitution Supporting Conservative to which I make no apologies for nor back down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: cva66snipe
I gave you the answer to it. It did not require war. It required allowed pilots with nice large missiles and bombs to be allowed to shoot back without having to go through Mother May I's to do so. Hit them like that and it would stop. We needed to fish or cut bait in Iraq we did neither one.

We could have bombed Iraq till kingdom come and it wouldn't have put Hussein out of power. We had to send ground troops into to do that.

72 posted on 07/20/2007 2:48:28 AM PDT by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson