To: Dilbert San Diego
President Bush gets no credit for cracking down on corrupt CEOs and accounting firms after they had gotten away with murder under Clinton.
Bush set a standard that has given investors confidence. It was his Justice Dept. that went after Enron and Worldcom and all the rest.
8 posted on
07/19/2007 2:38:35 PM PDT by
kristinn
To: kristinn
exactly! don’t forget Terry McAwefuls $18million gain from defunct Global Crossing.
32 posted on
07/19/2007 3:52:07 PM PDT by
sappy
To: kristinn
President Bush gets no credit for cracking down on corrupt CEOs and accounting firms after they had gotten away with murder under Clinton.
Absolutely. Indeed, I strongly believe that Clinton deliberately allowed the CEO's crimes to continue so their companies' stock prices would be artifically inflated, creating a bubble and a fake impression of prosperity.
To: kristinn
President Bush gets no credit for cracking down on corrupt CEOs and accounting firms after they had gotten away with murder under Clinton. You know, you make a good point. I always thought it was Clinton's "anything goes" / no interference from the MSM / administration that led to a lot of that coporate malfeasance. It just seemed to me that they thought, "Hey, the President's corrupt (and probably a few of them dropped some bucks in his pocket), we can get away with it, too".
Or, as I like to say, I use the moral standard WWBCD - "What would Bill Clinton do?". It gives me a LOT more leeway.
61 posted on
07/20/2007 4:00:19 AM PDT by
Hardastarboard
(DemocraticUnderground.com is an internet hate site.)
To: kristinn
"Bush set a standard that has given investors confidence. It was his Justice Dept. that went after Enron and Worldcom and all the rest."
Thank you President Bush!
68 posted on
07/20/2007 8:27:40 AM PDT by
1035rep
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson