Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: perfect stranger

That’s exactly what I mean.

So all this wailing, sackcloth and ashes nonsense about our “turning our food into fuel” is nothing new. We’ve done it before, only we were feeding crops into horses instead of cars.


31 posted on 07/20/2007 12:52:16 AM PDT by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: NVDave

“So all this wailing, sackcloth and ashes nonsense about our “turning our food into fuel” is nothing new. “

So horses don’t eat if men don’t ride them? Food for horses is not “fuel”, I don’t care if people do ride them. If people didn’t, the horses would STILL require food. Additionally, It’s a safe bet there are more cars in New York State alone than there were ridden horses is the entire US in the 1850’s.

You may eat alfalfa and hay but I’d wager 99+% of the world’s human population does not. A sad excuse of a straw man argument, really.


32 posted on 07/20/2007 6:34:39 AM PDT by L98Fiero (A fool who'll waste his life, God rest his guts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson