Ronald Reagan was the only reason I’d have anything to do with your party in the past. Ron Paul is the only reason I’d have anything to do with your party in the future.
I am well aware that you don’t think you need or want my vote. Think again. I am not alone and I’m not going to be persuaded by the anybody but Hillary nonsense.
I saddened that you find it so difficult to understand the rather obvious and common-sense conclusion that “bad” is better than “worse”.
I gather that most people will be able to decide which lever to pull if the two choices for President turn out to be “John Edwards” and “Mitt Romney”. They will know which of those candidiates will appoint the conservative judges America needs to prune back our creeping government, whose growth has been ENABLED by liberal judges and which candidate will appoint more Constitution-ignoring liberal judges.
Of course, you are free to insist on a “third choice”, a vote for “none-of-the-above”. And you are free to snarl from the sidelines about your “moral superiority” while you do NOTHING productive.
But such “holier-than-thou” posturing strikes me as naive, selfish and vain.
Saaaaayy.....?
Are you really Ron Paul, the “vanity” candidate?
Well said Scarlet! Blackbird.