>The reason most voted for the amnesty bill was to get a political advantage with Hispanics. Again, it had nothing to do with globalism.<
Why do you think they wanted political advantage? If this bill had passed and was signed into law, there would emerge a one party political system, and the DINOcraps, (Socialists, to be polite), would be in total control. Do you really think a conservative patriot could ever again be elected?
The goal of these people is one world government, no sovereignty for any country, the ultimate purpose of globalism. So the amnesty bill had EVERYTHING to do with globalism.
Frankly, I’ve had it with globalist presidents. We certainly do not need another one.
Sorry, you'll get one whether you like it or not.
Sorry, you'll get one whether you like it or not.
Rhombus, meaning what, exactly?
Do you meant the fix is in for globalists? If so, I agree, even though we all keep hoping otherwise.
In case anyone here misses the subtle differences between candidates, IMO Ron Paul is the only one who might be able to stem the tide of globalism in federal government.