“No one has ever questioned the presence of al-Qaeda in Afghanistan and in Pakistan’s tribal areas, allied with and harbored by the Taliban warlords.”
This does not relate to my arguement. Ron Paul claims opposition to Operation Iraqi Freedom based on no declaration of war. But he supports military intervention in Afganistan without a declaration of war.
“The invasion of Iraq was over Saddam’s supposed violations of treaty obligations that forbid the development of WMD. “
This statement alone indicates that you have no understanding of Saddam’s obligations to the council. To call it ‘supposed’ violations show a complete lack of understanding of the terms of the cease fire that ended the first gulf war. The council unanimously concluded that Saddam was in breach of said terms.
“Being casual over the provisions of the Constitution or completely ignoring destroys its power as the safeguard of our liberty. “
These are more fallacious arguements.
” I was not aware that our ceasefire with Saddam and the U.N. resolutions specifically dealt with harboring terrorists. “
Yes, it dealt with many issues, including terrorism. The council unanimously concluded that Saddam was in breach of his commitments regarding terrorism. How would have Ron Paul enforced Saddam’s complaince with terrorism. (All lefties and anti-war Paul fans do not answer this question. They pretend instead as though I asked if large quantities of WMDs were found, which is what you have done and will do again).
“So, you’re saying there is a group that identifies itself as “al-Qaeda In Iraq” as the name of their group? And that they are directly affiliated and act under orders from the Bin Laden organization?”
Yes, the Al Qaeda in Iraq is foreign led. They had to resort to making up a guy in an effort to put an Iraqi face on their terror group.