To: pissant
Fred is making Mitt Romney look consistent on abortion. In the 90s, it seems like Fred’s opinion on the issue changed every year... in 1991 he was for it, as he was in 1993. In 1994 he was both for and against it. In 1996 he was against it, but in 1997 he was for it. Now he’s against it. But I guess now he’s sincere.
6 posted on
07/19/2007 7:43:29 AM PDT by
Alter Kaker
(Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)
To: Alter Kaker
10 posted on
07/19/2007 7:47:02 AM PDT by
ejonesie22
(Hillary has already beat Rudy, She is the better cross-dresser.)
To: Alter Kaker
It’s called tapdancing. He’s good at it too.
11 posted on
07/19/2007 7:48:42 AM PDT by
pissant
(Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
To: Alter Kaker
Look at his RECORD.
Then look at Romney’s.
19 posted on
07/19/2007 7:54:47 AM PDT by
RockinRight
(FRedOn. Apply Directly To The White House!)
To: Alter Kaker
Now, that's tapdancing. And you're not very good at it.
20 posted on
07/19/2007 7:55:06 AM PDT by
Clara Lou
(Thompson-Hunter '08-- imwithfred.com)
To: Alter Kaker
How was Thompson VOTING record on Abortion?
The rest is noise.
21 posted on
07/19/2007 7:55:20 AM PDT by
Leto
To: Alter Kaker
WHAT in the hell does it matter what his position on abortion is????????? FOR pete sakes we need a good candidate and do any of you see one running right now, would you rather see the Clinton slime back in the WH???
Come on folks, if he picks conserv. judges, what does his position on this matter, we need someone strong on defense NOW and nothing else matters.
27 posted on
07/19/2007 7:59:14 AM PDT by
Amanda75
(Amanda75)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson