Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kimberly GG; ejonesie22
Bottom line, making ANY ILLEGAL ALIEN eligible for ‘aspirations of citizenship’ without deporting them home and home to the back of the line, is AMNESTY.

I'm all for deporting everyone that we reasonably can, but I think you've stepped beyond the realm of reality, and are asking for something that beyond being unworkable will be wildly unpopular and would result in a candidate pushing for it to lose the election.

ejonesie22 explains it well in post 302.

317 posted on 07/19/2007 12:02:10 PM PDT by GCC Catholic (Sour grapes make terrible whine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies ]


To: GCC Catholic

I’ve read his post and disagree.

No one is suggesting rounding them all up and deporting them. It’s a straw argument and all or nothing Open Borders spin.

Attrition through enforcement is the ONLY solution.

Amnesty is NEVER, ever the solution.

And while Fred Thompson has mentioned attrition, because he believes that we must determine who is here and decide, gawd knows how, that some must be given aspirations of citizenship, the only illegal aliens attrition would apply to then, are those not given amnesty. He has also said that he’s more concerned about future illegal aliens more than the present, yet he’s not been specific about how he would effectively secure the border.

IMO, he covers all of his bases and none of them well.


332 posted on 07/19/2007 12:14:13 PM PDT by Kimberly GG (DUNCAN HUNTER '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson