Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CSM
”Roughly half of federal employees are female, and to recruit and retain the most talented women, the federal government must find a way to offer this assistance,” said Liz Connell,”

Yep, recruiting someone demanding equal pay for 17% less work is always a winning formula!

In some of the agencies I've worked for, you wouldn't believe some of the "talented" women I've seen employed the name of diversity! Can you say... "High-paid welfare"!?

I KNEW you could! (Mister Roger's impersonation)

14 posted on 07/19/2007 8:30:08 AM PDT by RogerWilko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: RogerWilko

I’m also a Fed (30 years) and I’m not in favor of this.

When I had my little ones, I had to use accrued leave, or
pay back “borrowed/advanced” leave. We didn’t even have leave donor back then.

But truthfully, we have a great many males retiring with well over 1000 (some over 3000) hours of sick leave which adds on to their years of service to increase their retirement annuity (not under the new retirement system. I don’t think I’ve EVER seen a female retire with that much because she had to use sick leave for childbirth and caring for sick children and elderly parents.

So in that sense, it would help level things out between the sexes.

We’ve had a couple of men request paternity leave, but not much. Truthfully, I think most men don’t much want to be around the house with a newborn. My husband didn’t.


15 posted on 07/19/2007 9:37:22 AM PDT by Help!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson