Posted on 07/19/2007 3:39:30 AM PDT by ovrtaxt
I would encourage all who post to this thread to keep this in mind. This isn't your typical lib vs. conservative issue.
NAU ping...
Agree bump
The Council on Foreign Relations is pushing for a
North American Union.
The standard of living is sinking for America's shrinking middle class and increasing lower class, exactly what the CFR wants to happen. This way, America and Canada can equalize its economy and standards with Mexico, a forced socialism upon Americans and the necessary preparation for erasure of our national sovereignty.
Building a North American Community [pdf file]
Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America
Obtain more information at the conservative and respected Eagle Forum website.
Why do we keep having these silly “summits”? They impose a staggering cost in police overtime, vandalism, businesses that have to close down for security reasons, etc. What exactly is it that the participants can’t say to each other via videoconference, or in small unpublicized meetings between a handful of them?
What exactly can’t they say?
They don’t want us to know the details! Thsi must be kept under the radar at all costs, you see, or the ‘amnesty effect’ will happen all over again.
Strange bed-fellows indeed against this fluster-cluck.
You can’t grandstand before the public (Look at us! Look what we’re doing! Admire us!) via teleconference! ;-)
While the CFR has pushed globalism since its formation, there are those that insist that membership in this POS organization is part of a conservative portfolio, or does not detract from one’s conservatism.
Hmm, maybe it isn't what they say, it's what they sign. As in, memoranda of understanding.
How much play on talk radio is this getting if any? I’ve heard at least 2 callers bring it up (super highway) to Hannity and he flatly denied knowing anything about it.
Conditioning is what cannot be accomplished by video conference.
They want you to know its comming they want you to get "used" to the idea. The video conferences occur, small meetings that really hammer out the details, this large meeting is strictly for public consumption, no matter how much they deny it.
How do they get so many people to go to these things?
Right. Watch what they do, not what they say.
Then again, the Freedom of Information act may not apply to these summits, since it's supranational? Anybody have any knowlwdge on that?
And there are legitimate questions raised, from more than legitimate and conservative sources, about what the CFR claims it espouses and to what its true intentions actually are.
Do we have any recourse to stop this madness?
I heard Roger Hedgecock specifically bring up the NAU like 3 weeks ago on Rush. He talked about it for a segment. Glenn Beck and Lou Dobbs also know about it.
Other than that, nothing. Seems like it’s right up Savage’s alley, though.
How did they get so many people to burn up the Senate swichboard over amnesty? People that know about this are pissed!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.