Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

10,000 Protesters Expected at North America Summit
stopspp.com ^ | July 17, 2007 | Jerome R. Corsi

Posted on 07/19/2007 3:39:30 AM PDT by ovrtaxt

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-149 next last
This North American Union is shaking up the old left/right paradigm. For example, the People's Global Action, a leftist protest group, is against it, while LaRaza for example, is for it. On the right, we have corporate and 'free-trade' interests for it, while those of us who believe in national sovereignty and border enforcement are against.

I would encourage all who post to this thread to keep this in mind. This isn't your typical lib vs. conservative issue.

1 posted on 07/19/2007 3:39:33 AM PDT by ovrtaxt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: processing please hold; nicmarlo; WorkerbeeCitizen; hedgetrimmer; ScaniaBoy; Cooter; ...

NAU ping...


2 posted on 07/19/2007 3:41:16 AM PDT by ovrtaxt (The FairTax and the North American Union are mutually exclusive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt
"This isn't your typical lib vs. conservative issue."

Agree bump

3 posted on 07/19/2007 3:41:39 AM PDT by WorkerbeeCitizen (An American Patriot and an anti-Islam kind of fellow. (POI))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt
Yeah, it’s yellow snow, but it doesn’t taste like antifreeze...
4 posted on 07/19/2007 3:45:16 AM PDT by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt
OUR MILITARY DID NOT DIE FOR AMNESTY
or THE NORTH AMERICAN UNION!



The Council on Foreign Relations is pushing for a
North American Union.


The standard of living is sinking for America's shrinking middle class and increasing lower class, exactly what the CFR wants to happen. This way, America and Canada can equalize its economy and standards with Mexico, a forced socialism upon Americans and the necessary preparation for erasure of our national sovereignty.

Building a North American Community [pdf file]

SPP.gov

Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America

NASCOcorridor.com

KeepTexasMoving.com

Kansas City Smart Port

Obtain more information at the conservative and respected Eagle Forum website.

5 posted on 07/19/2007 3:51:07 AM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

Why do we keep having these silly “summits”? They impose a staggering cost in police overtime, vandalism, businesses that have to close down for security reasons, etc. What exactly is it that the participants can’t say to each other via videoconference, or in small unpublicized meetings between a handful of them?


6 posted on 07/19/2007 3:51:38 AM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker

What exactly can’t they say?

They don’t want us to know the details! Thsi must be kept under the radar at all costs, you see, or the ‘amnesty effect’ will happen all over again.


7 posted on 07/19/2007 3:56:56 AM PDT by ovrtaxt (The FairTax and the North American Union are mutually exclusive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

Strange bed-fellows indeed against this fluster-cluck.


8 posted on 07/19/2007 4:02:31 AM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get back down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker

You can’t grandstand before the public (Look at us! Look what we’re doing! Admire us!) via teleconference! ;-)


9 posted on 07/19/2007 4:19:01 AM PDT by jnygrl (A big mouth coupled with a small mind is a dangerous combination)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo

While the CFR has pushed globalism since its formation, there are those that insist that membership in this POS organization is part of a conservative portfolio, or does not detract from one’s conservatism.


10 posted on 07/19/2007 4:21:13 AM PDT by David Isaac (Duncan Hunter '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt
Concurring bump. They're redrawing the political map on this one.
11 posted on 07/19/2007 4:21:49 AM PDT by lentulusgracchus ("Whatever." -- sinkspur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker
What exactly is it that the participants can’t say to each other via videoconference, or in small unpublicized meetings between a handful of them?

Hmm, maybe it isn't what they say, it's what they sign. As in, memoranda of understanding.

12 posted on 07/19/2007 4:23:28 AM PDT by lentulusgracchus ("Whatever." -- sinkspur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

How much play on talk radio is this getting if any? I’ve heard at least 2 callers bring it up (super highway) to Hannity and he flatly denied knowing anything about it.


13 posted on 07/19/2007 4:24:27 AM PDT by PrepareToLeave (Fight on Christian soldiers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker
What exactly is it that the participants can’t say to each other via videoconference, or in small unpublicized meetings between a handful of them?

Conditioning is what cannot be accomplished by video conference.

They want you to know its comming they want you to get "used" to the idea. The video conferences occur, small meetings that really hammer out the details, this large meeting is strictly for public consumption, no matter how much they deny it.

14 posted on 07/19/2007 4:24:58 AM PDT by Kakaze (Exterminate Islamofacism and apologize for nothing.....except not doing it sooner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

How do they get so many people to go to these things?


15 posted on 07/19/2007 4:27:00 AM PDT by Jack Wilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lentulusgracchus
Hmm, maybe it isn't what they say, it's what they sign. As in, memoranda of understanding.

Right. Watch what they do, not what they say.

Then again, the Freedom of Information act may not apply to these summits, since it's supranational? Anybody have any knowlwdge on that?

16 posted on 07/19/2007 4:29:23 AM PDT by ovrtaxt (The FairTax and the North American Union are mutually exclusive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: David Isaac

And there are legitimate questions raised, from more than legitimate and conservative sources, about what the CFR claims it espouses and to what its true intentions actually are.


17 posted on 07/19/2007 4:30:27 AM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

Do we have any recourse to stop this madness?


18 posted on 07/19/2007 4:30:39 AM PDT by YellowRoseofTx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PrepareToLeave

I heard Roger Hedgecock specifically bring up the NAU like 3 weeks ago on Rush. He talked about it for a segment. Glenn Beck and Lou Dobbs also know about it.

Other than that, nothing. Seems like it’s right up Savage’s alley, though.


19 posted on 07/19/2007 4:31:02 AM PDT by ovrtaxt (The FairTax and the North American Union are mutually exclusive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Jack Wilson
How do they get so many people to go to these things?

How did they get so many people to burn up the Senate swichboard over amnesty? People that know about this are pissed!

20 posted on 07/19/2007 4:32:39 AM PDT by ovrtaxt (The FairTax and the North American Union are mutually exclusive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-149 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson