[lormand]

"After reading a number of your posts, it appears that you spend your days surfing from thread to thread (all about Dr. Paul) posting the same pointless picture."

Awesome detective work there Mr. Holmes.

"Do you really feel that threatened by Dr. Paul’s candidacy?"

Yes, the US cannot afford to have surrender monkeys on both the GOP and DU side in 08.

"It’s really pathetic for you to imply that your fellow freeper supporters of Dr. Paul are “stupid infidels,” you might want to consider why you have such loathing for folks here."

I don't like the "new tone", or play nice strategy when dealing with National Security issues. I believe in being "frank" when at all possible.

Supporting a Ron Paul candidacy does make one a "stupid infidel", i.e., by proxy, supports the goal of the Jihad against the west.

[WhiteGuy]

I believe in being "frank" when at all possible.

Ok, frank it is.

Supporting a Ron Paul candidacy does make one a "stupid infidel", i.e., by proxy, supports the goal of the Jihad against the west.

Listen frank, it's really absurd for you to suggest that supporting Dr. Paul's candidacy is "by proxy" supporting "jihad against the west."

You should really talk to a mental health professional about why you have these sorts of thoughts and why you feel the need to draw attention to yourself by making ridiculous remarks.

Best wishes for a speedy recovery.

[Dead Corpse]

Yeah... because Jihadi's love it when folks like Ron Paul purpose Privateers corps to hunt down their Cells no matter what country they are hiding in and where regular US troops can't go. Jihadi's also love our politicians who have been firm backers of our 2A Rights that would make "sudden jihad syndrome" that much less effective.

But don't let my interruption of your pointless cheerleading for the status quo cause you to start thinking for once...

[nicmarlo]

the US cannot afford to have surrender monkeys on both the GOP and DU side in 08.

What do you call signing the SPP treaty, which purpose is to mesh three countries into one North American Union? The immediate purpose is to sink the US economy and stature so that Mexico's economy can rise....thereby attempting to equalize the three countries. Sounds like socialism in the short term and removing US sovereignty in the long term.