Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fanfan

Thanks for the ping. I can see that it might be reasonable to have special search procedures at the border as a condition for entry. That said, if the charter guarantees freedom of movement (which it does, as does the Constitution), then I can also see why it would be shaky legal ground to require citizens to allow infringement of some of their rights as a prerequisite for exercising their right of travel. I didn’t notice whether this guy was a Canadian citizen, though — if not, he shouldn’t automatically be accorded the guarantees that come with citizenship. However, if you’re going to actually damage someone’s property during the search, it might be reasonable to have an extra level of scrutiny.

Oh, and as for me, I love Canada. It’s indescribably beautiful; even better, everytime my hubby and I have visited people have been friendly, funny and so very welcoming (even in Quebec, where I was concerned about French snobbishness). True patriot love, indeed.


33 posted on 07/18/2007 9:31:49 PM PDT by ellery (I don't remember a constitutional amendment that gives you the right not to be identified-R.Giuliani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: ellery

Hi Ellery,

This was a BC man.
Screw the charter....when I fly back into Canada they check my luggage, and they better be checking everyone who crosses our border, Canadian citizen or not.


35 posted on 07/19/2007 4:24:24 PM PDT by fanfan ("We don't start fights my friends, but we finish them, and never leave until our work is done."PMSH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson