Posted on 07/17/2007 4:44:52 PM PDT by Admin Moderator
Hey stop f@!#ing deleting and banning Republicans who are for Ron Paul you piece of garbage. Just because we disagree with neocons on some issues doesnt mean you should ban us! You act like some f@!#ing Communist who stifles all dissenting opinions. If you and your goons werent going around banning all who disagree with Fred Thompsons fat ugly evil looking ass you would see Ron Paul Republicans all over your neocon front website. Ron Paul Republicans would destroy your neocon minions easily if we werent constantly banned you filth. You did the same bull s!@t to Pat Buchanan supporters. F#!! you and all your little posters who get away with calling Ron Paul names without any facts or anything real to say.
Btw Fred Thompson is a disgustingly evil looking bald bastard, Rino who has no chance of winning or beating any democrat. Support your little fake conservative crony you motherF#!!er.
>>>There is a reason the networks dont air footage of streakers at sports events. Same principle applies here I believe.
This is a prime example of the depths to which some Ron Paul supporters will sink in order to show their support for their candidate. I think more people need to see just who supports the man.
LOL
When did "good taste" become a consideration on a Ron Paul thread?
How do you think he really felt?
Considering that Ron Paul used to be a Libertarian, wouldn't he fit the textbook definition of a neo-con.
I consider myself a neo-con because I am a converted Libertarian.
You wrote: “Isnt this in pretty bad taste to repost this here?
This should be behind the admin wall for admin viewing only right?
There is a reason the networks dont air footage of streakers at sports events. Same principle applies here I believe.
“
Not comparable to streaking at all. More like wanting us to know what they have to put up with behind the scenes. I’m thinking that this is just an example/drop in the bucket. Besides, by posting this email, it proves FR isn’t a commie, fascist, censoring site at all, right?
Someone should go to a Ron Paul thread where there is a ping list of his core supporters and ping them this thread. ;)
And his hypocrisy on Pork.. for everyone else, it's almost treason, against the Constitution, but when it comes to getting pork for his own district, it's "just playing the game"
If you take into account his war stance and the fact he really isn't the purist that his minions claim, he is far closer to Chuck Hagel than Fred Thompson or Duncan Hunter.
I call myself a conservative but in truth I hate labels. I can say that most of my views political and social are conservative and based in Christian values.
Ron Paul himself does not turn me off of him....necessarily. It’s his supporters. They are, to the last one, the most infantile, foul mouthed bunch of jerks I’ve ever dealt with or read. Add to that, that many of them are these so-called “truthers” and frankly the old rule of not wanting to belong to any club that would have me, takes over.
You’d think he’d be *****n happy, what with Ron Paul’s juggernaut crushing everything in its path.
“Someone should go to a Ron Paul thread where there is a ping list of his core supporters and ping them this thread. ;)”
Might turn this thread into some kind of bug zapper light.
Absolutely. I'll bet it's from that Anonymous guy. Nobody else ever takes anything he says seriously, so it's good to see him finally gets some props.
“but his supporters are such assholes sometimes, all I can think of is how much I am looking forward to pinging them when he drops out...”
Not that I make a habit of revelling in the pain of others, but I do look forward to that day.
Maybe Rosie wrote the post
Have they forgotten Harry Brown?
Greer, O’Donnell, or Palm?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.