[Non-Sequitur]

if evolution must be true since it is so popular among scientists - and why would it not be popular if it was not true - then surely man made global warming must be true for the same reason.

Is jumping to conclusions and twisting the truth the only exercise you get? I support evolution because there is a considerable body of evidence to support it. I don't support global warming because there isn't a whole lot of evidence to support that.

How does it feel to be on the “wrong side” of science for once?

Not being a follower of creation science I wouldn't know. So tell us. How does it feel?

[FoolNoMore]

but sir, you used the “majority of scientists” card to support your arguement, i am only expecting that you would be consistant. since you are not consistant in that regard, why would you expect anyone else to be impressed by what the majority of scientists believe on another subject?

and sir, not be a follower of Prophet Gore, you are squarely on the wrong side of at least one heated scientific debate, at least as measured by the majority of scientists.

[4CJ]

I support evolution because there is a considerable body of evidence to support it.

What "evidence" is there that life "evolved" from inanimate matter?