Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Delacon; xcamel
Because their device is not yet optimized, they still need to input additional energy for the process to work.

Oh.

Ya needs MORE energy (to make the CO2 into CO) than what ya get from da sunlight falling on da (incredibly expensive) solar panels (which only generate usable power from 9:00 AM to 3:00 PM local every day anyway) .... So ya need to burn (some kind of mythical fuel) to convert (useful) CO2 into (poisonous) CO....

38 posted on 07/16/2007 7:26:37 PM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: Robert A. Cook, PE

Read the article I linked to. It states that they used a silicon based semiconductor that doesn’t provide enough power. Next they are going to try a gallium-phosphide semiconductor which should produce better results. No mention of whether or not they will have to still add non sunlight energy to the mix then. Hey, if Orville and Wilber had as many nay sayers on their first 10 second flight at Kittyhawke we’d still be blimping it around the world. :)


48 posted on 07/16/2007 7:35:32 PM PDT by Delacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson