Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WOSG
China is now the number one source of man-made CO2 but a good percentage is related to manufacturing products shipped to America. If we're going to offshore manufacturing we might as well offshore nuclear plants as well. It's better for us they assume the high-stakes risks. And it gives us more bombing targets.

The Japanese, who generally favor quality, have been having nuclear accidents and trying to hide them. I wonder how China will do with their preference for cheap. At least they are far away from us.

About the only way nuclear power could be financially viable in America at this time is if the plants were made offshore on wheels for an "undisclosed buyer", then shipped in real quick to a surprise location and turned on. The 20 years it takes to build a nuclear plant in this country is too target rich for our lawyers.

58 posted on 07/17/2007 2:27:07 PM PDT by Reeses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: Reeses

Nuclear power is very cost-effective once it is built.

The reasons that nuclear power took long to get built was due to a combination of Govt changing regs on the fly during the 1970s and 1980s, a process where you needed first a construction permit and *then* permit to operate. Now, a lot of those problems were identified and fixed.

As for safety, LWR and BWR reactors are very safe in the US and in other countries as well. Japan has had a few problems with their sodium reactors, fortunately the US no longer has any of these in operation. We should use lead-bismuth instead of sodium for our fast reactors.


59 posted on 07/17/2007 4:01:54 PM PDT by WOSG ( Don't tell me what you are against, tell me what you are FOR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson