Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Weeedley

There really should be three Iraqs; Shia, Sunni and Kurd. The three will never be able to co-exist without a Stalinist dictator like Hussein keeping them in line.


11 posted on 07/16/2007 10:13:59 AM PDT by stm (Fred Thompson in 08! Return our country to the era of Reagan Conservatism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: stm; dfwgator; Weeedley
There really should be three Iraqs; Shia, Sunni and Kurd.

Reality would be nice if it weren't so complicated.

Sure, let's just sit here like the "pirates who don't do anything" and say that three little Iraqs would be so much better.

Except that three little Iraqs might quickly turn into The Land Of Unintended Consequences.

1) Iran covertly or overtly annexes Shia-stan, occupies Basra and cuts off gulf access.

2) Sunni-stan devolves into a new hardcore Muslim Brotherhood terror training headquarters, unfettered by American military intervention.

3) Kurdistan becomes a success story just long enough to provide an example to Turkish Kurds that the best idea for them is to revolt against Turkish government and secede, bringing American troops into a hot war between the Kurds and the Turks.

Just because Iraq was an "artificial construct" of British imperialism doesn't automatically mean it's the worst option.

41 posted on 07/28/2007 1:51:23 PM PDT by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson