No, it was addressed to you specifically. You have a history on FR of derailing threads with that subject. Suffice to say that SCOTUS, in Miller, implied only militia-suitable arms are protected. Long arguments over whether sawed-offs meet that category have been had repeatedly without adequate conclusion; please, for purposes of this thread, accept that there is legitimate disagreement on the subject. If you seek resolution of that subject, please start another thread devoted to it.
I don't. I'm perfectly content to leave it at "SCOTUS, in Miller, implied only militia-suitable arms are protected".
The poster to whom I was responding, however, equated Miller's short, sawed-off, double-barreled shotgun with the WWI Trench Gun. I thought that was disingenuous and needed addressing.