Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: from occupied ga

What makes you think that the supremes will hear the case or more importantly find in favor of the individual right?


They’ll hear it because it is

Because there is no straight face argument to the contrary, if you look at the opinion. If they reversed, it would be on a standing issue, and not the individual right issue.

And the result is mild (guns in the home for DC residents, no criminal plaintiffs to worry about, etc.)

But it will be easy to find an individual right, and it would be a pathetic embarrassment to the dissenters to argue otherwise.


142 posted on 07/16/2007 1:31:27 PM PDT by Atlas Sneezed ("We do have tough gun laws in Massachusetts; I support them, I won't chip away at them" -Mitt Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Beelzebubba
They’ll hear it because it is

I just don't share your optimism about the supremes. They have avoided the 2nd amend for decades - probably because they don't want to strengthen individual rights.

But it will be easy to find an individual right, and it would be a pathetic embarrassment to the dissenters to argue otherwise

Remember this is the court that handed down the "pathetic and embarrassing" Kelo decision, apparently without feeling in the least bit embarrassed, so what is totally clear to us may not be so clear to as capricious and arbitrary body as the the supremes.

211 posted on 07/17/2007 3:43:24 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your most dangerous enemy is your own government, Benito Guilinni a short man in search of a balcony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson