Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: READINABLUESTATE
The wrong decision in this case would start a civil war.

This decision would only affect the federal government. Unless, the SCOTUS chooses to incorporate the 2nd amendment to apply to the states, then individual states like Illinois are free to do whatever they want regarding gun ownership.

104 posted on 07/16/2007 10:23:26 AM PDT by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: JeffAtlanta

This decision would only affect the federal government. Unless, the SCOTUS chooses to incorporate the 2nd amendment to apply to the states, then individual states like Illinois are free to do whatever they want regarding gun ownership.


Even if you are correct, keep in mind that good legal precedent is built one step at a time. Parker gives a good foundation to proceed from there. (Thurgood Marshall talked about this in the context of Civil Rights litigation strategy.)


146 posted on 07/16/2007 1:43:30 PM PDT by Atlas Sneezed ("We do have tough gun laws in Massachusetts; I support them, I won't chip away at them" -Mitt Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]

To: JeffAtlanta
This decision would only affect the federal government.

Actually, the rationale the D.C. circuit used to decide the case is premised on incorporation. The court reasoned that the D.C. law should be treated like a state law.

147 posted on 07/16/2007 1:44:52 PM PDT by Texas Federalist (Fred!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson