“The origin though, is clearly explained by quantum Mechanics. Something can come from nothing, it’s all about the odds.”
I think you assume to much into the quatum. we have few examples of it’s workings that we could demonstrate, and even fewer solid theories as to why they work.
Something has never come from nothing. It has only come from what we do not yet know!
Think of Schrotinger’s(I know that can’t be the right spelling) Cat. “That cat has no scientific proof of living!”
Well... it has no proof of *not* living either, therefore the previous statement is moot.
Ahh, but you don't have any evidence to support that assertion do you?
And the “fallacy” was making an assertion to or against the proof for God. Given the nature of the subject (and our lack of understanding) it is premature to assert such a thing. Thus- a fallacy.
Think of Schroedinger’s(I know that can’t be the right spelling) Cat. “That cat has no scientific proof of living!”
Schroedinger's cat thought experiment doesn't question Heisenberg's Uncertainty Equation. What it is questioning is the role of the observer. Heisenberg's Equation needs no outside observer. The particles position or momentum don't co-exist.
Here is poor example but maybe it will suffice. Blow up a balloon and let's call that a wave. Now, before you pop it with a needle, can you tell me where the deflated remnant is? You can't until you pop the balloon. Just like you can't have your cake and eat it too.