[oblomov]

>>Do ya think he would verify his philosophy as absolutely true?

No, he would not claim it to be true. Fish is a sort of Nietzscheanized pragmatist - he would claim an particular belief to be useful before he would claim it to be true.

[cinives]

ah, an adherent of John Stuart Mills ?

[sirchtruth]

No, he would not claim it to be true. Fish is a sort of Nietzscheanized pragmatist - he would claim an particular belief to be useful before he would claim it to be true.

So he's a moron?