Replies

Actually I have been trying to stick purely with QM. Non locality does seem to be a contradiction between QM and Relativity, but it appears that time and distance are relative and better understanding will probably clear up the differences. We just need another genius to come along and then we will all say that it was obvious ^_^

So they are incompatible, but you believe them both, and assume that someone will make them compatible.

The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle is testable. God isn't (paraphrased)

But the Uncertainty Principle is incompatible with another testable theory, that of relativity. God is testable, of course, just on a personal level.

You still don't see the problem in applying incomplete, inconsistant theories to God and claiming that the theories limit God himself?

So they are incompatible, but you believe them both, and assume that someone will make them compatible.

What parts of the theories are incompatible? What they are looking for is a theory that unites them.

Like I said, if you can provide evidence of a nonlocal event that transfers information faster than the speed of light then you might be right. Evidence is Great ^_^

But the Uncertainty Principle is incompatible with another testable theory, that of relativity. God is testable, of course, just on a personal level.

Yes but if I test the Uncertainty Principle I can show it to you and duplicate it. What is the prediction that you can make with your God test?

You still don't see the problem in applying incomplete, inconsistant theories to God and claiming that the theories limit God himself?

What is incomplete or inconsistent with the superposition principle? Until you can demonstrate that it is inconsistent you don't have much of an argument do you?