Is it wrong to demolish the temples? Depends how you look at it - from a perspective of tempering ethnic chauvinism and preventing the establishment of ethnic enclaves then from the government's view it is in fact justified. And this is what I have mentioned in the past - authoritative style measures meant to ensure racial stability.
Mark my words when I say it that America will in the future have to adopt the same type of policy to prevent racial violence in the future - look at France, Sweden and Denmark - there are large parts of the cities and in some cases entire cities that are completely off-limits to others. America is looking at the same type of future -
If you have lived in Singapore then you are well aware of Singapore's ethnic integration policy - what do you think of it? You agree that the Singapore government's policy that they can deny the sale of house where you want to live based on your race?
Malaysia gets much attention on this issue because the temples are a "place of worship" - supposedly an untouchable in a Western-style democracy.
“Mark my words when I say it that America will in the future have to adopt the same type of policy to prevent racial violence in the future - look at France, Sweden and Denmark - there are large parts of the cities and in some cases entire cities that are completely off-limits to others. America is looking at the same type of future -”
That is already happening Expat, look at Bush and the ‘religion of peace’ cowtowing too numerous to mention here. How about the St. Louis airport going to build foot washing bathins to suit Muslim hygiene? That will be wonderfully hygienic for the rest of the travelers I am sure.
What we need is to stop the double standard of eliminating Christian-Judeo symbols from our society and replacing them with Islamic ones. Failure to do this will become like our other double standard, immigration with the population formenting another civil war with conservatives on the right and liberals on the left.
Appeasement only works for short periods of time as is demonstrated again and again throughout history against an murderous, evil philosophy. Despite islamic appease with Denmark and France (don’t know much about Sweden) they got more violence. Any whisper from the government on stopping more outrageous demands of setting up their own islamic state within a state is met with more violence and we are only seeing the tip of the iceburg over there. So Bush probably has bought him/us some short term reprieve from muslims joining jihad en masse but the result will be very bad in the end. Watch what happens when we have a nuclear/chemical WMD attack in one of our major cities. I don’t think the rest of the ‘religion of peace’ population here in the States will be treated so kindly any longer.
Israel tried appeasement for almost two decades and the death toll rose on both sides. When and only when, Mecca and Medina are vaporized by either the US or Israel will these madmen feel their ideology is beyond flawed. I don’t advocate nuking these areas but I feel it will come to that one way or the other.