Skip to comments.
General Dynamics delivers first MRAP vehicles designed to deflect blasts from IEDs
General Dynamics ^
| Jul 11, 2007
Posted on 07/15/2007 12:13:56 PM PDT by bnelson44
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
1
posted on
07/15/2007 12:14:01 PM PDT
by
bnelson44
To: bnelson44
WASHINGTON: Delivery delays have spurred the Pentagon to consider ordering up to 20,000 more armored vehicles needed to protect U.S. soldiers from roadside bombs in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Hampered by industry production constraints, the Marine Corps may launch a second competitive bid this month for upgraded Mine Resistant Ambush Protected, or MRAP, vehicles, according to a government document.
Production delays have put the Pentagon behind schedule on deployment so the second bid would aim to attract companies that may not have bid on the first go-round.
http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/07/13/business/NA-FIN-US-Pentagon-Armored-Vehicles.php
2
posted on
07/15/2007 12:15:44 PM PDT
by
bnelson44
(http://www.appealforcourage.org)
To: bnelson44
Amazing that it’s taken so long to field something better than an up-armored humvee.
3
posted on
07/15/2007 12:20:28 PM PDT
by
glorgau
To: bnelson44
...first MRAP vehicles designed to deflect blasts from IEDsCan I get one of these for commuting on the D.C. beltway?
4
posted on
07/15/2007 12:22:27 PM PDT
by
69ConvertibleFirebird
(Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.)
To: bnelson44
5
posted on
07/15/2007 12:24:18 PM PDT
by
BJungNan
To: bnelson44
Super-jeep.
Not only munitions-resistant, but able to ford streams and climb steep terrain.
What they could have done with something like this during the Battle of the Bulge in 1944.
But the technology simply did not exist then.
6
posted on
07/15/2007 12:24:53 PM PDT
by
alloysteel
(Choose carefully the hill you would die upon. For if you win, the view is magnificent.)
To: bnelson44
7
posted on
07/15/2007 12:25:04 PM PDT
by
bnelson44
(http://www.appealforcourage.org)
To: bnelson44
8
posted on
07/15/2007 12:25:08 PM PDT
by
BJungNan
To: glorgau
It’s not as simple as just going to the GM showroom, the MRAP’s are a bitch to ship from a logistics standpoint, they are not designed for air transport with what we currently have, they are going to either be shipped via Russian contractor via a Kondor, or by container ship.
I am glad they finally got them however, that is good news indeed.
9
posted on
07/15/2007 12:25:17 PM PDT
by
padre35
(Conservative in Exile.)
To: bnelson44
My fear is they will just build bigger IEDs
10
posted on
07/15/2007 12:27:31 PM PDT
by
jws3sticks
(Hillary can take a very long walk on a very short pier, anytime, and the sooner the better!)
To: bnelson44
11
posted on
07/15/2007 12:28:28 PM PDT
by
BJungNan
To: bnelson44
As someone who fought in Iraq,I still believe the best way to prevent IED attacks is to put a cap into somebody whilst they are in the process of burying them.
12
posted on
07/15/2007 12:29:54 PM PDT
by
ac-rep
To: jws3sticks
So what happens when they blow the tires and axel off the thing?
13
posted on
07/15/2007 12:30:07 PM PDT
by
BJungNan
To: BJungNan
Hmmvs are nothing more than an SUV and it is a disgrace that they have been used as APCs since Somalia or ever again since then anyway. JMHO.
14
posted on
07/15/2007 12:31:02 PM PDT
by
omega4179
(Are we serious about Islams global war on freedom?)
To: BJungNan
I was talking to my son, the tanker, about the MRAP and he wasn’t that impressed ;->
15
posted on
07/15/2007 12:34:18 PM PDT
by
bnelson44
(http://www.appealforcourage.org)
To: BJungNan
Photo: A US Marine Corps RG-31 Cougar rests on its front axel after an improvised explosive device detonated under the vehicle near Camp Taqaddum, Iraq, Jan. 6. The IED detonated directly under the vehicle; however, the blast was pushed outward instead of directly straight up due to the vehicle's V shaped undercarriage. Of the five service members in the vehicle, two received concussions and two others received minor burns. (Photo by: Courtesy photo by 8th Engineer Support Battalion)
16
posted on
07/15/2007 12:36:00 PM PDT
by
bnelson44
(http://www.appealforcourage.org)
To: BJungNan; bnelson44
To: bnelson44
This is the first delivery of General Dynamic’s product. There are lots of others already in service, based largely on the South African’s designs. Good to have more production ramping up but don’t think that this has been completely ignored. I know it’s tempting(and fashionable here) to see everything in as negative a way as possible but it is not always so.
18
posted on
07/15/2007 12:37:52 PM PDT
by
Uriah_lost
("build bridges where you can - but draw lines where you must." -Fred D Thompson)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Those are older vehicles.
19
posted on
07/15/2007 12:40:05 PM PDT
by
bnelson44
(http://www.appealforcourage.org)
To: Uriah_lost
Looks like they also will be asking for more bidders and increase production even more.
Good to see.
20
posted on
07/15/2007 12:41:07 PM PDT
by
bnelson44
(http://www.appealforcourage.org)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson