Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: <1/1,000,000th%
A Look at Creation “Science”—Part II

From DarwinCentral.org's blog. Deals with baraminology.

598 posted on 07/19/2007 5:28:08 PM PDT by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 597 | View Replies ]


To: Coyoteman

no doubt nothign but biased info- much like has been posted here by those that can’t stand hte idea that their system might have problems ando ne might be more precise.


599 posted on 07/19/2007 6:29:16 PM PDT by CottShop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 598 | View Replies ]

To: Coyoteman
But I don’t have to respect your belief and I do not think that legislation requiring that the Biblical version be included in public school textbooks is either constitutional or fair. How about Ormuzd? Ouranos? Odin? There is an unnumbered throng of religions, each with its creation myth—all different.

The only comment I would make to this is that none of these religions created anything worth celebrating (although I think Viking long ships are cool). Christianity created the United States of America, which is, so far, the free-est, greatest country the universe has ever known.

I agree that a lot of what baraminology is saying is "preposterous".

607 posted on 07/20/2007 9:40:48 AM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 598 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson