[edsheppa]

while there is absolutely NO way to test for common anscestry as held by the evo classification system

Putting aside the fact that I asked you first, if I make the effort to post a prediction from common descent, will you at last drop the bullshit and either link to or make the argument you claim?

[CottShop]

The argument I made is already madew by the field of Baraminology-

[[if I make the effort to post a prediction from common descent, will you at last drop the bullshit]]

I’m not interested in predictions for common descent- common descent has no biological evidence ot support it- it’s a simple hypothesis based on an a priori belief. predictions for common descent rely on natural selection and show nothign more than adaption- microevolution.

[CottShop]

since you won’t investigate hte predictions yourself, Here’s a starter link- the rest is up to you:

Google “predictions made by baraminology” http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=predictions+made+by+baraminology

Here’s one link with some predictions: http://baraminology.blogspot.com/2006_04_01_archive.html

and another: http://www.crsblog.org/

another prediction: “Evidence for typological isolation in the fossil record confirms the laboratory evidence that change is limited and the creation model prediction that populations resist change”

http://mbbc.us/creation/species.htm

You will find much if you search Sheppa.