Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Coyoteman
[[If there was a global flood about 4350 years ago, why does it not show up in archaeological sites and sediment deposits worldwide?]] It doesn't show up? According to whom? http://www.answersingenesis.org/tj/v11/i2/nature.asp "Mt. St. Helens laid down 7.6 metres (25 feet) of finely laminated sediments in a few hours." "If this was the true scenario, then those climate effects would be almost global, and there would be similar climate and dust anomalies elsewhere on Earth corresponding to the same historical time frame. There is just such evidence found in the ice cores extracted from Mount Kilimanjaro in Africa and across the Atlantic in the Huascaran glacier, which is high in the Peruvian Andes of the southern hemisphere." http://www.kjvbible.org/greenland_ice_sheet.html [[Why are there still egyptians?]] Repopulation "The drought conditions, which would have followed the flood because much of the Earth's vegetation had perished, leaving little or nothing with living root systems to hold the soil down, would be predictable. The settlements would have remained abandoned for many years until the descendants of Noah's family multiplied and began to spread out across the Earth." [[If this is such compelling evidence, why is it not accepted by science?]] Gosh- I dunno
444 posted on 07/16/2007 8:21:49 PM PDT by CottShop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 441 | View Replies ]


To: CottShop
Repopulation "The drought conditions, which would have followed the flood because much of the Earth's vegetation had perished, leaving little or nothing with living root systems to hold the soil down, would be predictable. The settlements would have remained abandoned for many years until the descendants of Noah's family multiplied and began to spread out across the Earth."

Sorry, that happens not to be the case.

There are many areas of the world where DNA from prior to 4350 years ago is the same as after 4350 years ago.

There was no replacement with Noah's family's DNA.

In other words, no global flood 4350 years ago. That is a religious belief with no scientific evidence.

(By the way, AnswersInGenesis is not a science website. They are peddlin' pure apologetics. Pay them no mind.)

445 posted on 07/16/2007 8:28:51 PM PDT by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 444 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson