And that is nonsense- there is plenty of evidneeces which might indicate world wide flood- the simple fact that not all would agree, and that some make excuses to wave away the evidneces is not sufficient to undermine the evidences that are observed
What culture's scientists, not exposed to the bible, have postulated that there was a global flood about 4350 years ago?
China? Japan? Korea? India? Egypt? Anywhere?
Does it not strike you as odd that scientists around the world don't postulate a global flood about 4350 years ago? It is only bible literalists who do so.
Perhaps you should admit that its a religious belief, rather than a scientific finding.
[[What culture’s scientists, not exposed to the bible, have postulated that there was a global flood about 4350 years ago?]]
Well gee coyote- I’m not sure there- Didn’t know that not being exposed to hte bible was a criteria for objectively discovering evidence for a flood- gosh- ya got us there big fella! Evidently, if anyone has been exposed ot hte bible, they can’t be a true scientist in your mind, if they dissagree with you= amazing. The ‘rules of science’ must have a secretive claus hidden away somewhere that only you know about?
[[Does it not strike you as odd that scientists around the world don’t postulate a global flood about 4350 years ago?]]
And you know this how? Been calling everyone who practices science have ya? You made the difinitive statement no scientist ever would conclude- you must have been aweful busy getting everyon’es opinion on the matterr